Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
a method of sociological analysis that examines how individuals use everyday conversation and gestures to construct a common-sense view of the world.
Answer:
Giuseppe is using a schema to help him reconstruct his memory for the event.
Explanation:
A schema consists of a cognitive frame or conceptualization that contributes to the organization and interpretation of information. Schemas can be helpful in that they make it possible for us to interpret the large amount of information that sorrounds us with less effort. In the case of Giuseppe, he is making use of it in order to recapitulate past information about the wedding to which he attended.
New Hampshire i think I’m not sure tho
