So 7 is greater I am not smart I am just trying to answers some question
<h3>
Answers:</h3>
- ST = 23
- RU = 8
- SV = 5
- SU = 10
====================================================
Explanation:
Focus on triangles SVT and UVT.
They are congruent triangles due to the fact that SV = VU and VT = VT. From there we can use the LL (leg leg) theorem for right triangles to prove them congruent.
Since the triangles are the same, just mirrored, this means ST = UT = 23.
-----------------------
Following similar reasoning as the previous section, we can prove triangle RVU = triangle RVS.
Therefore, RS = RU = 8
-----------------------
SV = VU = 5 because RT bisects SU.
Bisect means to cut in half. The two smaller pieces are equal.
-----------------------
SU = SV + VU = 5+5 = 10
Refer to the segment addition postulate.
Answer:
7.2 years
Step-by-step explanation:
where f(t) is the length and t is the number of years old
given the Mike measures 148 cm, we need to find out the age
So we plug in 148 for f(t) and solve for t
divide both sides by 200
Now subtract 1 from both sides
Divide both sides by -0.956
Now take ln on both sides
divide both sides by -0.18
t=7.2
So 7.2 years
The total length of the fencing is 248 ft; we call this the "perimeter" of the garden. Since P = 2W + 2L in general, here:
P = 248 ft = 2W + 2(W+6), or 248 ft = 4W + 12.
Subtracting 12 from both sides of this equation: 236 ft = 4W. Then W = 59 ft, which means that L = 65 ft.
Answer:
The sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational." By definition, an irrational number in decimal form goes on forever without repeating (a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal). By definition, a rational number in decimal form either terminates or repeats.
Step-by-step explanation:
However, if the irrational parts of the numbers have a zero sum (cancel each other out), the sum will be rational. "The product of two irrational numbers is SOMETIMES irrational." Each time they assume the sum is rational; however, upon rearranging the terms of their equation, they get a contradiction (that an irrational number is equal to a rational number). Since the assumption that the sum of a rational and irrational number is rational leads to a contradiction, the sum must be irrational.
