Answer:
The commensal relationship between the sharks and remoras can be described as although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.
Explanation:
A commensal relationship refers to a relationship where two or more organisms in a habitat neither benefit or harm each other.
- The second option infers that the remoras harm the sharks. This is a parasitic relationship.
- The third option infers that the sharks are harmed by the remoras because the sharks depend on something that the remoras are limiting. This is also a parasitic relationship.
- The fourth option infers a commensal relationship, but falsely describes it. The relationship described by this option is a parasitic relationship (one benefits, the other does not).
Therefore, the answer is the first option: Although remoras consume parasites, sharks with remoras show no better health or growth than sharks without remoras.
Answer:
<em>change</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>genetic</em><em> </em><em>structure</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>popu</em><em>lation</em><em> </em><em>over</em><em> </em><em>time</em>
Answer:
when comparing dogs to wolves, scientists found evidence that supports the idea they come from a common ancestor. which evidence was most important in understanding this? comparable anatomies, fossils, and behavior different anatomies, similar development, and different dna comparable anatomies, similar development, and similar dna different anatomies, fossils, and behavior
Explanation:
Answer: The biological definition of Archaea is any of the unicellular microorganisms that is genetically distinct from bacteria and eukaryotes, and often inhabiting extreme environmental conditions.
Explanation: