Answer:
d.$24,000
Explanation:
Given that
Issuance of common stock = $32,000
Number of shares = 2,000 shares
Stated value per share = $12 per share
By considering the above information
The common stock would be credited for
= Number of shares × Stated value per share
= 2,000 shares × $12 per share
= $24,000
Hence, the correct option is d. $24,000
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
Schedule M-1 is required when the gross income of corporations or their total assets at the end of the year is greater than $ 250,000.
Schedule M-3 asks certain questions about the financial statements of the corporation and reconciles the net income (loss) of the financial statements for the corporation (or group of consolidated financial statements, if applicable).
Answer:
50,900 units
Explanation:
a. The computation of the units were transferred out of Work in Process Inventory is shown below:
= Beginning inventory of work in process units + added to the production units - ending inventory of work in process units
= 8,100 units + 47,600 units - 4,800 units
= 50,900 units
Basically we added the production units and deduct the ending inventory of work in process units to the Beginning inventory of work in process units so that the transferred out units could come
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
Answer:
it might be B but I'm not sure
