1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly [62]
3 years ago
9

James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While

employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied ever using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Keller has applied for a position at a summer camp for girls, ages 14-18. The camp director had called Radical Board's manager and asked for a reference on Keller. A) Radical Board has no liability if it simply verifies Keller's employment there. B) Radical Board has liability for its failure to prosecute Keller. C) Radical Board has no liability for the actions of employees beyond their job description. D) Radical Board enjoys a privilege against defamation if it discloses the peep hole story. E)None of the above
Law
1 answer:
GalinKa [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

E. None of the above

Explanation:

Some employers think companies can only release dates of employment, salary and some other facts, but that is not the case. There are no federal laws restricting what an employer can or can´t say about former employees. Some states may have laws about what can legally disclose.  

So in this case Keller was fired so Radical Board can tell the Camp Manager what happened and that he was fired, and if he wants to he can also tell them about the suit against him.

You might be interested in
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain what you would do to minimize the tailgating hazard
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

uh make a left? I'm not sure

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Peter Cannon Questions: [a] Why should judges care if attorneys submit plagiar
Nataly [62]

Answer and Explanation:

A. Because plagiarism is a crime and contradicts an attorney's moral and ethical code. This takes away all the credibility of the lawyer, shows that he is not able to hold the position, in addition to showing that he acts in criminal activities of high gravity and therefore must be punished immediately and have his profession questioned.

B. The Iowa court referred to other cases involving plagiarism, which is the practice that allows someone else's works and words to be copied without due credit. Cases of plagiarism are very common and the Iowa court must treat everyone with the same severity in order for them to be fought.

4 0
3 years ago
Please help 50 points
joja [24]

Answer:

I tried, Sorry If it isin't right

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
______ deterrence is directed toward individual offenders to discourage reoffending.
Allushta [10]

Answer:

"specific" deterrence

5 0
3 years ago
Long-arm statutes: a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. b. have been ruled unconstitutional
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

<h3>a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.</h3>

Explanation:

  • Long-arm statutes are laws that allow state courts to acquire automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. The courts can apprehend an out-of-state defendant based on certain actions which have connections with the concerned state.
  • The provisions of a long-arm statute normally grants a state court the right to jurisdiction over a non-state domicile if the individual has minimum connection within the state's court jurisdiction.  
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Roles john locke in devepment constitutional law
    13·2 answers
  • In Abel v. Baker, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in th
    11·1 answer
  • One person’s consumption of a product reducing the amount available for other people is a characteristic of a __________ good.
    6·1 answer
  • What does the Bill of Rights do?
    12·1 answer
  • Beth is researching different ways that she could save money in a bank. She notices that the certificate of deposit requires her
    7·1 answer
  • Fav show on netflix??
    9·2 answers
  • give a description of a recent (2018-2020) example of how xenophobia has displayed itself in community's​
    8·1 answer
  • The United states is
    5·1 answer
  • The principles evolved by the courts in England in interpreting statutes are adopted and applied with local
    15·1 answer
  • Am I cool? Correct answers only or I will banish you to the shadow realm...
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!