Answer:
The combination of qualities of Understanding culture, society, and politics has given one’s minded many impacts and significance especially when it comes to enhancement. Studying culture encourages one to learn the same aspects that have brought one today with our blood heritage. It is worth learning and protecting its very life. The disparity between us and other citizens from other countries is also a cultural identification, and that, is one of the importance of UCSP to us, it makes us know what is our identifications as an individual. Other than those, UCSP is also for everybody, it can be a wide tool for a deep understanding of the community’s characteristics. A helping instrument to become more knowledgeable of your heritage, politic matters in your society, and general perspectives.
A thermal imager can identify if marijuana is being grown in a house bt focusing on high-intensity halide lamps used to grown them.
<h3>What is a Metal-halide lamps?</h3>
These are lighting lamps that are used for general lighting purposes both indoors and outdoors, but are used as source of light for growing plant as well.'
Hence, thermal imager can help to identify if marijuana is being grown in a house by detecting the infrared rays radiating from the lamps by scanning the roofs and walls of the home.
Read more about thermal imager
brainly.com/question/10501228
#SPJ1
Answer:
Brown v. Ohio is the case of the Double Jeopardy Clause ruled by the Supreme Court of the US on June 16, 1977.
Explanation:
"Brown v Ohio" is a landmark case in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, Nathaniel Brown stole a Chevrolet an East Cleveland and was caught nine days later by Wickliffe officials. He was charged with 'joyriding' by Wickliffe officials and sentenced to jail for one month with a penalty of $100. After his release, he went to East Cleveland, where he was again caught and convicted of the same. Brown, then, pleaded the Double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment in the Supreme Court, where the courts reversed the Appalette court's decision.