When a manager needs to make a decision using the ethical decision-making process and reaches the second stage, they check whether the decision violates the c. fundamental rights of any stakeholders
The ethical decision-making process involves making decisions that are consistent with the relevant ethical views of the company which it draws from the society it is based in.
The second stage of this process involves checking whether the ethics involved in a certain decision, would violate the fundamental rights of shareholders which include:
- The right to ownership
- The right to Dividends
- The rights to evaluate corporate decisions
- The right to voting power
This is to ensure that the shareholders are taken care of because the first duty of a manager is to their shareholders.
In conclusion, managers need to check whether a decision affects the fundamental rights of shareholders before they embark on it.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/8864856.</em>
<em />
The options for this question include:
a. utilitarian beliefs
b. the global commons
c. the fundamental rights of any stakeholders
d. home country values
Answer:
Quantity variance.
Explanation:
The difference between actual and standard cost caused by the difference between the actual quantity and the standard quantity is called the Quantity variance.
For instance, if Tony needs a standard quantity of 50 pounds of iron to construct a burglary, but only used 51 pounds, then the quantity variance is 1 pound of iron.
<em>Hence, the quantity variance is simply the difference between the actual quantity of materials that should be used and the quantity of materials that was used. </em>
Answer:
D. The auditor should assess the risks of material mis-statement due to fraud.
Explanation:
At the time of auditor visit in a company the financial statement represent that the company has done the fraud in this scenario, the auditor should analyze the material misstatement risk that is done for fraud
Therefore in the given case, the option D is correct as the auditor responsibility is that he or she should analyze the risk with respect to the false statements presented in the financial statement
Answer:
A) high magnitude of consequences.
Explanation:
Delayed product delivery is less of an issue when compared to delivering a faulty product, which can potentially cause harm. This is because delivering a faulty product has a high magnitude of consequences.
The customer is the king in the market, the company can not afford to lose reputation by a delivery faulty product. Especially in the era of social media, these mistakes can cause loss of market share and can potentially damage the credibility of the company´s product, which could take lot of time to rebuild. It may also affect other product of the company to lose reputation.