<span>There are infinite numbers between 0.4 and 0.5. The reason is that there are infinite rational as well as irrational numbers between 0.4 and 0.5, therefore, we cannot exactly give all the numbers between 0.4 and 0.5.
</span>
These are <span>the numbers</span>
0.41,0.42,0.43.0.44,0.45,0.46,0.47,0.48,0.49
Answer:
that is an obtuse angle and mixed with an aacute, you answer should be 45 or 50 degrees please correct me if im wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
A coin has one of two outcomes: heads or tails.
Each has an equal probability of occurring, meaning that they each have a 50% chance to occur. (They need to add up to 100% because they include all the outcomes, divide that into two equal parts and...)
This is what we call theoretical probability. It's a guess as to how probability <em>should</em> work. Like in the experiment, it's not always going to be 50-50.
What <em>actually happens</em> is called experimental probability. This may vary slightly from theoretical probability because you can't predict probability with complete certainty, you can only say what is <em>most likely to happen</em>.
We want to find the probability of getting heads in our experiment so we can compare it to the theoretical outcome. To do this, we need to compare the number of heads to the total number of outcomes.
We have 63 heads, and a total of 150 coin flips.
That makes the probability of getting a heads 63/150.
The hard part is getting this ratio into a percent.
You can try simply dividing, but you should be able to notice something here.
SInce the top and the bottom of our fraction are both divisible by 3, we can <em>simiplify</em>.
63 ÷ 3 = 21
150 ÷ 3 = 50
So we could say that 63/150 = 21/50.
A percent is basically a fraction out of 100.
Just like you can divide the parts of a ratio by the same number and it will stay the same, you can also multiply. To get the fraction out of 100, let's multiply by 2.
(since 50 × 2 = 100)
21 × 2 = 42
50 × 2 = 100
21/50 = 42/100 = 42%
Comparing our experimental probability to the theoretical one...it is 8% lower.
Answer:
y = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph passes through the point (3, 4), which means that the value of the function is 4 when x=3.
Answer:
I'd use a Non-probability Sampling Method.
Explanation:
The question is already laced with criteria - Heights of Buildings in New York.
This means that there are certain buildings that won't fit in the sample. In a non-probability sample, objects or subjects are elected based on specified criteria that are not random. This means that not all objects/subject have a c<em>hance</em> of being included in the sample.
It is assumed that the question/assignment centers around high rise buildings.
Therefore, one storey buildings and bungalows that are within and outside New York will not be included in the sample.
Under the Non-Probability Sampling Method, it is essential to note that there are other subgroupings of sampling techniques. They are:
- Convenience Sample
- Voluntary Sample
- Purposive Sample
- Snowball Sample
Cheers!
