A. i am pretty sure it is A.
Answer:
The value of the firm according to M&M Proposition I with taxes is $513,824.62
Explanation:
Value of firm = [EBIT x (1-Tax) / Equity Cost] + [Debt x Tax rate]
Value of firm = 82000 x (1-24%) / 13% + 143500 x 24%
Value of firm = 62320 / 0.13 + 143500 x 0.24
Value of firm = 479,384.62 + 34,440
Value of firm = $513,824.62
Answer:
-$5,500
Explanation:
The computation of the overall effect on the company net operating income is as follows:
New Variable cost per unit is
= $44 + $11
= $55
Now the new contribution margin per unit is
= $220 - $55
= $165
New unit Monthly sales is
= 7,000 units + 500 units
= 7,500
Now
New total contribution margin :
= 7,500 units × $165
= $1,237,500
And, the Current total contribution margin is
= 7,000 units × $176
= $1,232,000
So, the change would be
= $1,232,000 - $1,237,500
= -$5,500
Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) They have the opportunity to reject the proposed change.
b) They will have the opportunity to know more than others about the change.
c) They will be able to convince customers the change was the right thing to do.
d) They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
And the correct answer is the option D: They will feel a sense of ownership of planned change and are more likely to be on board.
Explanation:
To begin with, it will be more acceptable for an employee of a company or a member of a group to agree with a change if that person was involved in the planning of the change. That means that he will feel that he is part of the solution and therefore part of the team because his ideas were listened and maybe he contributed with something. That is why that members who participate in the planning of a change will always be more positive about the final outcome due to the fact that they were there during the process of deciding that outcome and that will make them feel integrity related to the work and to the team as well.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
