Answer:
Explanation:
a former Haitian slave who led the only successful slave revolt in modern history. Standing firmly, he fought to end slavery and gain Haiti's independence from european powers, France and Spain. Forming an army of former slaves and deserters of the French and Spanish armies, he trained his followers in guerrilla warfare and successfully ended slavery in Hispaniola in 1795.
Although he did not live to see it, Toussaint's actions launched a series of global events that changed the geography of the Western Hemisphere and spelled out the beginning of the end for European colonial domination in the Americas. Frustrated by a rebellion he could not control in Hispaniola, Napoleon Bonaparte decided not to expand his empire to North America and sold the territory of Louisiana to the United States in 1803. This paved the way for Western expansion throughout the 19th century. Toussaint's actions also inspired revolutions in several Latin American countries over the next 100 years and American abolitionists to fight for an end to slavery.
the answer to your first question is simple great britain wanted to benefit from trade to get richer and to sell the goods they got back to the colonies.
the reason the revolution war started was all because of trading. britain wanted to benefit from the trade to get more money but britain also didnt want the colonies trading with anyone but them. britain started to send troops into the colonies because they didnt want to have to fight a war and have to pay more money. britain also raised the taxes on imported goods and tea so that the colonist would have to pay more money.
Answer:
As a Catholic I can say that in a moment the salvation depended on the words of Our Lady when she accepted the will of the Lord by saying: "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord. May it be done to me according to your word."
We, as Catholic, believe that God created humans with freedom (free will) and that God respects human freedom. Jesus Christ is the greatest proof that God respects our freedom. Jesus is "the image of the invisible God" (Col 1:15), and therefore is the one to whom we turn when we want to discover how God relates to people. Jesus did not force people to follow him or to do what was right. He chose Apostles, but he only invited them to follow, and when Judas turned against him, Jesus did not force him to choose the right thing. He allowed Judas to say no. When Jesus invited the rich young man to follow him, and the rich young man turned away, Jesus did not force him to change his mind (Mk 10:17-22). When Jesus said, "I am the bread of life," and many of his disciples refused to believe him, Jesus did not force them to accept his word; he let them walk away (John 6:60-71). Therefore, Jesus, the image of the invisible God, teaches us that God respects human freedom.
Now, is it possible that, in the most important event in human history, God would disregard human freedom and simply make Mary the Mother of God's Son without her consent? We read in Luke 1 that the angel announced God's will to Mary. The angel waits until Mary says, "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord. May it be done to me according to your word." Only then does the angel leave. This indicates that Mary consented to God's will.
The only other possibility is that Mary did not consent. In that case, she became pregnant by a miracle to which she did not freely consent! This would mean that the Son of God became a human being in the womb of a woman who did not want to become his Mother! This would mean that God completely disregarded human freedom and human choice in the one event which would begin the process of our salvation. This is clearly an impossibility. To summarize, there are two possibilities: God either invited Mary to become the Mother of God's Son and accepted her consent, or God simply made Mary the Mother of God's Son without her consent. The first choice, it seems to me, is consonant with the Bible and with our understanding of God as given us through Jesus Christ. The second presents an image of God which is pagan in its implications (for pagans, the gods simply used human beings) and which contradicts Scripture and the nature of God.
<span>Charles II.
The easy way to remember this is that both James I and Charles I came before the Civil War, and Charles II and James II came after the Civil War and before the Glorious Revolution.</span>
D. You group like things, typing isn't really used in that sense, classifying is another word for grouping, but cataloging is and after action list
