The greatest difference between the 14 points and the ToV is the blame for the war. In the ToV Germany is blamed for the war and the Treaty is more a sentence than terms of an armistice, to where the 14 points was more a negotiated settlement for an armistice. The 14 points may have included and recognized the new German and would have brought that government into the negotiation process. Many aspects would have been difficult for Germany to agree to but instead of the agreement being forced upon them the new German government would have played a role in the resolution. It was the Germans that first accepted the 14 points for an armistice, knew the terms, and exiled there emperor I believe that there would have been strong support to honor the agreement by the German people. The ToV on the other hand was made to punish the Germans, Breakup the German Empire, and have the Germans pay for the war. It was also made to negate the role played by Wilson and the USA in the war. The ToV also allowed the Allied powers to keep their colonies and only the German colonies were, in some point in time, to be open for autonomous rule. The 14 points might have prevented WW2, the ToV was the punishment that bound the German people together to avenge the disgrace.
I hope I helped!
Zimbabwe was along one of the most significant trading routes, and by taxing the active trade going on through the city(and the state), the Zimbabwe kings made a lot of profit.
Anglo-Russian Entente, (1907) pact in which Britain and Russia settled their colonial disputes in Persia, Afghanistan, and Tibet. It delineated spheres of influence in Persia, stipulated that neither country would interfere in Tibet's internal affairs, and recognized Britain's influence over Afghanistan.France and Russia
It was A. Though both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X both
worked on the goal of helping blacks in their struggle for civil rights in the United States in the 1960s,
their approach and speech was very different.
Martin was more conciliatory in his approach. He used peaceful methods and often
incorporated the teachings of the Bible.
He wanted blacks and whites to coexist with each other. Malcolm on the other hand, was very
aggressive in his approach. He was not
afraid to lash out at what he viewed was the unfair treatment that blacks were
given and encourage violent means to achieve that goal.
