1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pashok25 [27]
3 years ago
15

The passage suggests that the high inflation in the United States and many European countries in the 1980's differed from inflat

ion elsewhere in which of the following ways?(A) It fit the rational expectations theory of inflation but not the inertia theory of inflation.
(B) It was possible to control without causing a recession.
(C) It was easier to control in those countries by applying tight monetary and fiscal policies than it would have been elsewhere.
(D) It was not caused by workers’ and employers’ expectations.
(E) It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere.
Business
1 answer:
vlabodo [156]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

E) It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere.

Explanation:

The US inflation rate during 1979 was 11.26%, during 1980 it was 13.55%, and during 1981 it was 10.33%. These numbers may seem very high for American standards, but they aren't really high once you compare them to other nation's inflation rate.

For example, if we look at what is happening in two South American countries right now; Currently Venezuela is facing a hyperinflation measured by millions, and Argentina's current inflation rate is around 60%.

Back in the 1980s, hyperinflation rates were much more common. Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Nicaragua, all suffered from hyperinflation (inflation rates in the 1,000s).

The US dollar is considered a very stable currency, that is why an inflation rate of around 10% was considered extremely high for American standards, but not so high compared to the rest of the world.

You might be interested in
Changes in stockholders' equity Listed are the equity sections of balance sheets for years 2014 and 2015 as reported by Mountain
svet-max [94.6K]

a. Mountain Air's net income for fiscal 2015 is $910,000.

b. The number of new shares issued is 1,120,000.

c. The price per share of the new stock sold during 2015 is $4.20.

d. The original price of the shares was $2.08.

a. The net income is

= $1,500,000 - $800,000 + $210,000

= $910,000

b. The number of  New Share issued is

= 1,600,000 - 480,000

= 1,120,000

c. The price of the new stock per share sold is  

Par Value 1,120,000

Add: Paid In excess Of par (4,100,000 - 520,000) 3,580,000

Net Proceeds from issuance of shares 4,700,000

Number of New Share Issued 1,120,000

Now  

The Average price per share of the new stock sold is

= 4,700,000 ÷ 1,120,000

= $4.20

d. The original price of the share is  

The original issuance price is

= (Paid-in-capital account + common stock account) ÷ original shares  

= (520,000 + 480,000) ÷ 480,000

= $2.08

Therefore we can conclude that

a. Mountain Air's net income for fiscal 2015 is $910,000.

b. The number of new shares issued is 1,120,000.

c. The price per share of the new stock sold during 2015 is $4.20.

d. The original price of the shares was $2.08.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/13931207

5 0
3 years ago
Identify the percent increase in total sales and the percent increase in sales of trench coats. Then find which percent of incre
geniusboy [140]

The percentage increase in the total sales for 2006 is 15% while the increase in sales of the trench coats is 23.3%; therefore the percentage increase in total sales of trench coats is 8.3% faster.

Computation:

1. The total amount of sales for 2006 and 2007:

\begin{aligned}\text{Sales of 2006}&=103+297+210+213+137\\&=960\end{aligned}

\begin{aligned}\text{Sales of 2007}&=127+223+210+285+259\\&=1104\end{aligned}

2. Now, the percentage increase will be determined for the total number of coats and trench coats:

For the total number of coats, the values used will be the total sales of 2006, and total sales of 2007.

\begin{aligned}\text{Percentage Increase}&=\dfrac{\text{Sales of 2007}-\text{Sales of 2006}}{\text{Sales of 2006}}\times100\\&=\dfrac{1104-960}{960}\times100\\&=15\%\end{aligned}

For the trench coats the values used will be the sale of trench coats in 2006 and 2007.

\begin{aligned}\text{Percentage Increase in Sale of Trench Coat}&=\dfrac{\text{Sales of 2007}-\text{Sales of 2006}}{\text{Sales of 2006}}\times100\\&=\dfrac{127-103}{103}\times100\\&=23.33\%\end{aligned}

3. Now, the  net percentage increase in sales due to the trench coats is computed as follows:

\begin{aligned}\text{Net Percentage Change}&=\text{\text{Percentage Increase in Trench Coat}-\text{Percentage Increase}}\\&=23.33\%-15\%\\&=8.3\%\end{aligned}

Therefore, the correct option is option B. Sales of trench coats increased 8. 3 percentage points faster than total coat sales.

To know more about percentages of increase in sales, refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/45525

4 0
2 years ago
An industry is composed of 10 firms, all with equal sales (e.g. firm 1 sales are 10% of the market, firm 2 sales are 10% of the
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

0.40

Explanation:

The four firm concentration ratio = 10%+ 10% + 10% + 10% = 40% =0.40

I hope my answer helps you

5 0
3 years ago
Price discrimination is possible when a firm is able to​ ______.
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

d. identify and separate different types of​ buyers, and sell a product that cannot be resold

Explanation:

Segmenting the market into different groups is a way to charge varying prices. Each group has their own demand curve.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Paula receives a nonliquidating distribution from Pell Corporation. Paula’s basis for her Pell stock is $10,000. In exchange for
Juliette [100K]

Answer: $13000

Explanation:

From the question, we are told that Paula receives a nonliquidating distribution from Pell Corporation. Paula’s basis for her Pell stock is $10,000 and in exchange for her stock, Paula receives real estate with an $8,000 basis and a $15,000 fair market value that is subject to a $2,000 mortgage.

The amount of Paula’s basis in the real estate she received will be the net fair market value of the real Estate. It should be noted that this is the difference between the market value and the mortgage amount. This will be:

= $15,000 - $2,000

= $13,000

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Classify the following topics as relating to microeconomics or macroeconomics.
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose that a computer software company controls the operating system market. Although the government knows that the price is h
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the six buyer-readiness stages along with the marketing strategies used at each stage.
    13·1 answer
  • A career plan should include all of the following EXCEPT:
    11·2 answers
  • On which of the following levels are databases not used?
    6·1 answer
  • A risk-free bond will pay you $1,000 in 2 years and nothing in between. The annual discount rate is i=27.5% compounded annually.
    7·1 answer
  • Alpaca Corporation had revenues of $245,000 in its first year of operations. The company has not collected on $18,800 of its sal
    13·1 answer
  • COST OF PRODUCTION (5 pts each for a total of 25 pts) a. What is the relationship between the marginal cost of production and av
    8·1 answer
  • 5. Would most standard bank accounts work for Janet based on her banking needs? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
  • Anna is creating a personal balance sheet. she plans to list these items. bank account jewelry health insurance rent which state
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!