Answer:
The opportunity cost in this scenario is the three lost opportunities Harry experiences by deciding to go to his parent's house. The term opportunity cost refers to the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. The potential gain Harry may have lost by choosing to go to his parents for dinner instead could be relaxation while fishing, His house painting being finished, and time spent with his friends at the birthday party. These all can be considered lost opportunities due to choosing an alternate opportunity, that being dinner at his parents.
Explanation:
Hope this helps if so
pls mark brainliest :D
Answer:
Case 1 (Fordjour v. Ahmed case on rent) and Case 3 (Giz Construction v. Ministry of Roads on Nonpayment of project ) are civil cases which entail one party by talking the other party to court over money. Ahmed was taken to court by his landlord Fordjour over rent arrears while Minirtsy of Roads was taken to court for non-payment of project by Giz Construction. Case 2 (GRA v. Melcom over Tax payment) is criminal case as it entails Melcom violating laws stipulated by the government.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act which was signed by president Barack Obama in 2010 made significant changes in the provisions of HIPAA
<h3>What is American Recovery and Reinvestment Act</h3>
Basically, the ARRA was a piece of legislation aimed at stimulating the economy.
It included measures to modernize the energy and communication infrastructure and enhance energy independence.
Under ARRA, provisions were made for business associates to comply directly with most provisions of the HIPAA Security Rule.
Learn more about the ARRA at brainly.com/question/1366132