Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data:
-decreases the experiment's reliability and validity
- wastes time and resources
- destroys the scientist's credibility in their field
- may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design
- is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise
Explanation:
There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>
I believe you are referring to Nucleic acids.
Answer:
Point-source pollution is easy to identify. As the name suggests, it comes from a single place. Nonpoint-source pollution is harder to identify and harder to address. It is pollution that comes from many places, all at once.
<span>We know that electrons are occupied on a cloud surrounding
the nucleus. So which means that the bigger the electron cloud, the bigger the
number of electrons. So in this case, since Na shrank so it lost some
electrons. And since Cl+ grew in size of the electron cloud so electron was
added to it.</span>
