1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stella [2.4K]
3 years ago
12

All eukaryotic cells are multicelular? True False

Biology
1 answer:
noname [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Uhhhh false, multicellular means a living thing made up of two or more cells soooooooooo...

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How does killing whales affect the food chain?
sukhopar [10]

Whales play an important role in stabilizing the aquatic food chain and reproduction of other species.

As more whales are killed the food distribution in the ocean becomes destabilized and causes changes in the food supply of many other kinds of marine life.

Whales are vital to the food chain, stabilising food flow and maintaining a healthy ocean.

As such, the rapidly decreasing whale population will have major effects on the ocean's ecosystem.

Believe it or not, whale poop also serves quite an important purpose to the ecosystem.

3 0
3 years ago
In the hydrologic cycle, water from the ocean into the atmosphere where it can and change back into tiny water droplets
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

True

//////////////

3 0
3 years ago
Question: Using your understanding of the 4 macromolecules explain how Earth’s early atmosphere and the 4 molecules taught could
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

Advanced forms of life existed on earth at least 3.55 billion years ago. In rocks of that age, fossilized imprints have been found of bacteria that look uncannily like cyanobacteria, the most highly evolved photosynthetic organisms present in the world today. Carbon deposits enriched in the lighter carbon-12 isotope over the heavier carbon-13 isotope-a sign of biological carbon assimilation-attest to an even older age. On the other hand, it is believed that our young planet, still in the throes of volcanic eruptions and battered by falling comets and asteroids, remained inhospitable to life for about half a billion years after its birth, together with the rest of the solar system, some 4.55 billion years ago. This leaves a window of perhaps 200-300 million years for the appearance of life on earth.

divine interventionThis duration was once considered too short for the emergence of something as complex as a living cell. Hence suggestions were made that germs of life may have come to earth from outer space with cometary dust or even, as proposed by Francis Crick of DNA double-helix fame, on a spaceship sent out by some distant civilization. No evidence in support of these proposals has yet been obtained. Meanwhile the reason for making them has largely disappeared. It is now generally agreed that if life arose spontaneously by natural processes-a necessary assumption if we wish to remain within the realm of science-it must have arisen fairly quickly, more in a matter of millennia or centuries, perhaps even less, than in millions of years. Even if life came from elsewhere, we would still have to account for its first development. Thus we might as well assume that life started on earth.

How this momentous event happened is still highly conjectural, though no longer purely speculative. The clues come from the earth, from outer space, from laboratory experiments, and, especially, from life itself. The history of life on earth is written in the cells and molecules of existing organisms. Thanks to the advances of cell biology, biochemistry and molecular biology, scientists are becoming increasingly adept at reading the text.

An important rule in this exercise is to reconstruct the earliest events in life's history without assuming they proceeded with the benefit of foresight. Every step must be accounted for in terms of antecedent and concomitant events. Each must stand on its own and cannot be viewed as a preparation for things to come. Any hint of teleology must be avoided.

3 0
3 years ago
Plants and animals have a mutualistic relationship. Explain how.
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

They connect through a cycle

Explanation:

Both plants and animals can be a food source for animals. Plants also create an environment so that animals can live with less complications

5 0
3 years ago
2. Using the scale baron the image, roughly how far has the
Margarita [4]
If I knew I would say
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Bulk movement of water across plasma membranes and the exchange of oxygen from blood into cells are similar in that the method o
    5·1 answer
  • Data refers to ____ A. theories B.inferences, C.hypotheses D.observations
    9·1 answer
  • When you anticipate the results of your expierement before you begin, you are making a
    7·1 answer
  • Which is the broadest most inclusive category of life on Earth
    14·1 answer
  • What membrane protein identifies the cell to the immune system?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP: Why do we need 250 different kinds of cells?
    9·2 answers
  • What will happen if Paramecium Sp is exposed to sunlight​
    11·2 answers
  • How is instructions for your traits carried on DNA molecule​
    14·1 answer
  • What is a common characteristic between both prokaryotes and eukaryotes?
    15·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP NOW!
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!