Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
It follow the format known as: <span>symposium-forum.
</span><span>In symposium-forum format, we can expect to see a chairperson that accompanied by several presenters (in most events it would be around three or four)
</span>This format is most commonly used in event that provide experts with an opportunity to propose their theory, findings, or their opinions regarding other experts' works.
Answer is in the file below
tinyurl.com/wpazsebu
I would say that the tone was humorous