England won the skirmish because the weather heavily favored the English and separated the Spanish Armada and destroyed some of their ships.
This is true . Jesus told him to write them when he died.
Hope this helped :)
When Perry came back to Japan, he brought more ships than he had in 1853 to convince the Japanese to negotiate
The treaty was approved as a consequence of stress from U.S. Commodore Matthew C. Perry. He traveled into Tokyo Bay with a fleet of warships in July 1853 and asked for the opening of Japanese´s ports to United States ships for accumulations. Hethen left Japan seeking to give the government a few months to think its judgment.
Answer:
We can list as similarities between these two empires their location, the way how they built their cities, and the period they build their empires. The differences, however, are more visible. For the differences, we can separate into two points: the government and the war practices.
Explanation:
The Babylonians were harsh with their laws. An example of this point is the Code of Hammurabi. Dated from around the year 1700 BC, this law agreement was based on the lex talionis, or "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". The violence of these laws is one of the main differences between Babylonians and Hittites.
The Hittites Law Code was more complex and consistent. This is because of their nomadism, and especially because they had the precept to capture their enemies. So, their laws must be range. We can name their laws based on the concept of causes, which means, your actions would be punished according to their strength. However, there was no death penalty (capital punishment), and many of the crimes were solved trough tax payments or fines.
When it comes to war, the Babylonians were not used to combat. Even if they had an army and the pretense idea of expansion, they were closer to the research and scholar world. Many astronomical discoveries were proceeded by the Babylonians. On the other hand, Hittites were warriors.
Answer:
The Dominican military went through moderate change, and its most obstinate components were dispatched abroad, regularly on imaginary political missions. In spite of destitution and hardship, the change toward popular government proceeded.
Haitian powers mounted close constant attacks against its neighbor all through the 1840s and 1850s. Out of irritation and dread, one venturesome Dominican president hit upon the ideal arrangement: he restored his nation to Spain, which continued frontier rule from 1861 to 1865.
This activity incited severe dissent in Haiti, uneasy about Spanish force, and in the US, shocked by quite an outrageous infringement of the Monroe Convention.
As in Cuba, American speculators started demonstrating interest in Dominican sugar when the new century rolled over. U.S. military intercession from 1916 to 1924 fixed this two-sided relationship. Before the finish of the occupation, two American aggregates possessed eleven out of the 21 ingenious (factories) in the nation and five of the others were claimed by U.S. residents.
Explanation:
There can be hazard in nearness to the US. Alongside Mexico and Focal America, islands of the Caribbean have shared this obvious reality. Through exchange, venture, intrusion, and tact, the US applied exceptional impact over patterns and occasions here all through the 20th century. Along with Focal America, investigation of the Caribbean gives significant point of view on difficulties confronting the district all in all and on the multifaceted nature of between American undertakings.
