Women's lives did not improve at all if anything they were worsened. Rich woman during the renaissance had very little say in anything and was taught to help their husband run a business and take care of him and the house. The poor woman had no say in anything they only had to choices at life, they could either be a housewife and take care of the kids and the house ore they had to become a nun. The poor woman could not be single or have any rights.
The role of women was very scarce. Women were supposed to be seen and not heard. Rarely seen at that. Women were to be prim and proper, the ideal women. Females were able to speak their minds but their thoughts and ideas were shaped by men. Mostly everything women did had input given by men. Women were controlled by her parents from the day she is born until the day she is married, then she would be handed directly to her husband so he could take over that role. In the time of the renaissance, women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical ‘housewives.'
Though women were inferior to men, women in different classes had different roles. Low-class women were expected to be housewives and take care of everything to do with the house. The expectation of working-class women was a little bit different. These women were expected to work for their husbands and help them run their business. They would work alongside their husbands and then go home and take care of the household. Upper-class women may have had servants and workers working for them but the women were still expected to take care of the household.
Women could not work by themselves. Neither could they live alone if they were not married. If a woman was single, she was made to move in with one of her male relatives or join a convent and become a nun. There was no other option at this time for women.
In conclusion in different classes of women, the only women that were allowed to express themselves were upper-class women, but not sufficiently. The existence of women was there but it was a marginal existence. Very rarely would a woman of less than upper class be seen or heard expressing herself. It was unheard of. When women did express themselves, what they would express was tainted by male influence.
this is the citation I already put it through citation machine Gender Roles of Women in the Renaissance, www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/eng/lfletcher/shrew/acloud.htm#:~:text=Mostly%20everything%20women%20did%20had,legally%20belong%20to%20their%20husbands.
Explanation:
please make mine the brainleist answer so i can get 19 more points. thank you
<h2>
Answer: A. to help people stay healthy
</h2>
Explanation:
Elizabeth Blackwell was born on February 3, 1821 in Bristol, England, but moved to the United States in 1831 along with her family. Elizabeth was the first woman who managed to practice a medical profession in the United States, which is why she is considered an example of the struggle for female emancipation.
It should be noted that the impulse that led her to want to be a doctor was the death of a friend, who before dying of a terminal illness told Blackwell that she wished she had been treated by a woman. This event marked her life and the idea of being a doctor emerged in her, so she sent letters of request to all the universities of New York and Pennsylvania, without receiving a response.
After ten universities rejected her application, she was admitted to Geneva Medical College (New York) and on January 11, 1849 she became the first woman to receive a medical degree in medicine in the United States.
Latinos are a highly sought after group by political parties because they are a large and rapidly growing group. By tapping into this vital voting block one could guarantee the party's winning election. A large motivated group voting regularly could mean party control of certain regions for years or even decades.
- A Loyalist who opposed war with Britain.
- The United States' first Episcopal bishop.
<h3>
Who was Samuel Seabury?</h3>
- Samuel Seabury (November 30, 1729 – February 25, 1796) was the first American Episcopal bishop, the Episcopal Church's second Presiding Bishop, and the first Bishop of Connecticut.
- During the American Revolution, he was a prominent Loyalist in New York City and a renowned opponent of Alexander Hamilton.
- In 1729, he was born in North Groton (later renamed Ledyard), Connecticut, in a home that is now a Historic Landmark on the corner of Church Hill Road and Spicer Hill Road in Ledyard, Connecticut.
- Samuel Seabury (1706-1764), his father, was a Congregationalist clergyman in Groton before becoming a deacon and priest in the Church of England in 1730.
Therefore, what describes Seabury is:
- A Loyalist who opposed war with Britain.
- The United States' first Episcopal bishop.
Know more about Samuel Seabury here:
brainly.com/question/12860357
#SPJ4
