1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex
4 years ago
5

The Arizona-New Mexico territory was renamed the Confederate Territory of Arizona after the South

History
1 answer:
Tanya [424]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

The territory was officially declared on August 1, 1861, following the Confederate victory at the Battle of Mesilla. ... In July 1862, the government of the Confederate Territory of Arizona relocated to El Paso, Texas.

You might be interested in
What statement best describes the Catholic Church during the Renaissance?
DIA [1.3K]
The answer you would be looking for is A.

8 0
4 years ago
What was the significance of the british reform act of 1832?
alexira [117]
<span>The Representation of the People Act 1832 (known informally as the 1832 Reform Act, Great Reform Act or First Reform Act to distinguish it from subsequent Reform Acts) was an Act of Parliament (indexed as 2 & 3 Will. IV c. 45) that introduced wide-ranging changes to the electoral system of England and Wales.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What treaty was signed in 1821?What era did this bring to a close in Texas?
puteri [66]
February 2nd,1848 the treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo is signed,ended the Mexican war.this treaty established Texas southern bounbary at the Rio Grande
6 0
4 years ago
What is a papacy???????
dimulka [17.4K]
Papacy means: he office or authority of the Pope. is the correct anwser you are looking for 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should nato be involved in russia and crimea conflict?
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Firstly, heavier NATO involvement in Crimea would escalate the current crisis. Shifting the focus of the confrontation from Ukraine-Russia to US-Russia would tie Putin’s hands, and virtually disable him from backing down. The strong support he received from Russia’s Parliament, along with the approval for use of the armed forces, should be seen not only as a proof of his personal strength in Russia, but also a limitation on his room for maneuver. If confronted by a NATO intervention, he would have no choice but to respond by escalating. A further hardening of Russia’s position would generate the potential for spillover in other states that Russia considers within its sphere of interest. Thus, overly aggressive NATO moves in reaction to Moscow’s moves could have a negative impact on developments relating to Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

source:https://www.boulevard-exterieur.com/Why-NATO-should-not-move-on-Crimea.html

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Islamic slave traders sent African slaves to _______ during the period from the 900s to the 1400s. A. Northern Russia B. Mexico
    15·2 answers
  • Which geographic locations did the arab empire control through the year ad 750
    14·2 answers
  • How did brtish accept the declaration of independence?
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think Justinian decided the time has come to reform Roman law
    5·1 answer
  • Cual seria la importancia para la profesión de enfermería de la existencia de las leyes que la regulen?
    14·1 answer
  • A federal system of government has_______.
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways has black dissent and political power been criminalized?
    15·1 answer
  • How did Perry help the United States expand its influence in Asia?
    6·2 answers
  • What nation was required to pay reparations (war damages) to the Allies?
    7·1 answer
  • Because Hamilton believed that human nature was intrinsically ______, he sought to link the interests of the ______ with those o
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!