Answer:
osmotic diuretic
Explanation:
Osmotic diuretic -
It refers to the type of diuretic , which resists the absorption of the sodium and water , is referred to as osmotic diuretic .
In simple terms , it refers to the condition of increased urination , where additional water comes out along with urine .
The reason for Osmotic diuresis can be -
Higher level of sugars in blood .
As the client is facing the issue of increased intracranial pressure , where the amount of fluid around the brain is reduced which is a fatal condition , so in order to avoid this condition , Osmotic diuretic is given , so that the excess fluid can comes out with urine .
Hence , the correct term is osmotic diuretic .
Answer:
$739.72 ≈ 739.72
Explanation:
we can use an excel spreadsheet and the present value function to calculate the expected price of each bond ⇒ =PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv,[type])
- fv = $1,000
- pmt = $1,000 x 7.25% x 1/2 = $36.25
- nper = 60
- rate = 10% / 2 = 5%
- present value = ?
=PV(5%,60,36.25,1000) = -739.72 since excel calculates the initial investment, it is always negative, so we just change the sign.
It's 16.282. ok I don't think for sure though
Answer: b. funds provided by borrowing.
c. funds provided by the sale of assets.
d. funds provided by issuing common or preferred stock.
Explanation:
The financial statement consists of two main components which are the balance sheet and the income statement. The balance sheet simoly shows the financial standing of a firm.
Of the options, those that can found in the balance sheet are:
b. funds provided by borrowing.
c. funds provided by the sale of assets.
d. funds provided by issuing common or preferred stock.
Answer:
the net cost of debt to a firm is generally less than the cost of equity.
Explanation:
If we assume both, investor in firms and lender to firms want's a certain return x
because the lender return (the interest) are tax deductible the net cost of debt will be: x ( 1 - t)
where t is the tax rate being rate beteen 0 and 1
as 1 less a fraction will be less than 1 we can stablish that:
x > x(1 - t)
x is the cost of equity
while x(1-t) is the net cost of debt
therefore, the cost of debt is lower than cost of equity.
