Answer:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Raking 2% interest rate:
1) 10 years
2) 5 years
3) 1 year
Raking 18% interest rate:
1) 1 year
2) 5 years
3) 10 years
Explanation:
You have to apply to bring the amount of money to present value, according with the information, the formula is the next:
Present Value = Future Value/((1+ interest rate)^(n))
Where n is the number of years that you have to wait to receive the money.
You have to calculate every situation with the respective amount of time and interest rate, the result must be money. and when you get the 9 results, you have to compare every situation and chose the higher amount of money according to the interest rate, for example:
Present value = 140/ ((1+10%)^(1))= 127
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 149
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 135
So the answer for the first scenario with an interest rate of 10% is:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Answer: Zero
Explanation:
The Correlation Coefficient measures the relationship between 2 variables under study and ranges from -1 to +1 which -1 meaning that the two are perfectly negatively correlated and +1 meaning they are perfectly positively correlation. A Correlation Coefficient of 0 means that there is no relationship.
An efficient market is one where all information is available to every market participant. This means that one cannot use information from one period to make abnormal profits in another period because all information is available. The Correlation Coefficient will therefore show 0 because information from the previous period is not being used in another period meaning there is no relationship between stock returns.
That statement is true
Healthy dining finder is a website that could be used as a guide for its users to find healthier options for dining. In order to use its service, users just need to input their state address, ZIP or their city and the website would automatically provide results on the nearest location of restaurants that provide healthier eating option.
Answer:<em> Option (D) is correct </em>
Explanation:
To weaken the conclusion, the answer will emphasize on why Baurisia will not soon become an importer of grain.
Here, in this case if importing meat is cheaper than importing grain, then Baurisia is likely to satisfy the demand for meat by becoming an importer of meat, weakening the conclusion that Baurisia will soon become an importer of grain.
<em>Therefore , It is more economical for Baurisians to import meat than grain, if true, most seriously weakens the argument.</em>
The AAA payed farmers to reduce their production in order to raise prices.
