The government has continued to pursue antitrust prosecutions since World War II. The Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department watch for potential monopolies or act to prevent mergers that threaten to reduce competition so severely that consumers could suffer. Four cases show the scope of these efforts:
In 1945, in a case involving the Aluminum Company of America, a federal appeals court considered how large a market share a firm could hold before it should be scrutinized for monopolistic practices. The court settled on 90 percent, noting "it is doubtful whether sixty or sixty-five percent would be enough, and certainly thirty-three percent is not."
In 1961, a number of companies in the electrical equipment industry were found guilty of fixing prices in restraint of competition. The companies agreed to pay extensive damages to consumers, and some corporate executives went to prison.
In 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a combination of firms with large market shares could be presumed to be anti-competitive. The case involved Philadelphia National Bank. The court ruled that if a merger would cause a company to control an undue share of the market, and if there was no evidence the merger would not be harmful, then the merger could not take place.
In 1997, a federal court concluded that even though retailing is generally unconcentrated, certain retailers such as office supply "superstores" compete in distinct economic markets. In those markets, the merger of two substantial firms would be anti-competitive, the court said. The case involved a home office supply company, Staples, and a building supply company, Home Depot. The planned merger was dropped.
Answer:
It no longer had to go along the bible
Explanation:
After Galileo proved the Heliocentric theory, it opened peoples minds and they started questioning everything. idk tho
Answer:
d. Men gained more social power in an emerging middle class, while women were not afforded economic mobility.
Explanation:
took it
I believe it's D. In America women can vote, but in Athens women could not participate in government
Chavez holds the US government responsible for minorities' difficulties. Option A is the right answer.
<h3>Who exactly is Hugo Chavez?</h3>
Cesar Chavez was a labor leader and civil rights campaigner in the United States (US). In his mind, left-wing politics and Roman Catholic social education were inextricably linked.
He began his working life as a manual laborer before joining the US Navy for two years.
He mostly blamed the US government for minorities' difficulties, claiming that the US had a large amount of poverty, a lack of education, and a poor educational system.
In the United States, some minorities face a slew of challenges. As a result, Chavez pointed the finger at the US administration.
As a result, option A is right.
For more information about the minorities, refer below
brainly.com/question/27125627
