Answer:
PART A
(1) To reduce wastages
(2) To increase profit margin
(3) To reduce cost of operations.
PART B
(1) NO,he is not included
(2) Because he is unable to work or be gainfully employed.
Explanation:
Layoff is a manpower management process through which Organisations down size their manpower strength or number in order to meet certain specified Objectives. Layoffs usually takes place in Organisations that are not meeting their Strategic objectives such profit making,cost reduction and Control etc.
Unemployment is a term used to describe the inability of a person or group of persons who are willing and have the capacity to work but could not secure gainful employment in an economy.
MR. SMITH DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO WORK,HENCE HE CAN NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS.
Answer:
Accrued net income is $161,900
Explanation:
The formula to compute accrued net income is shown below:
= Revenue - expenses
where,
Revenue = Cash collected from customers + customers owed the company
= $295,000 + $51,000
= $346,000
And, the expenses equals to
= Cash paid for rent + Cash paid to employees for services rendered during the year + Cash paid for utilities + gas and electric expenses at the end of a year
= $31,000 + $111,000 + $41,000 + $1,100
= $184,100
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the answer would be equal to
= $346,000 - $184,100
= $161,900
Answer:
$7,750
Explanation:
The computation of the net income for the first year is shown below:
but before that following calculations needed
The Cost of production is
= Direct material + Direct labor + Manufacturing overhead
= $11,625 + $11,000 + $10,000
= $32,625
The Unit product cost is
= $32,625 ÷ 7,250 units
= $4.50 per unit
Now
Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold × cost per unit
= 4,500 units × $4.50
= $20,250
And, finally
Net Income = Sales revenue - COGS - general, selling, and administrative expenses
= (4,500 units × $7) - $20,250 - $3,500
= $7,750
Answer:2. Which of the following is the basis for Justice Ginsberg's opinion that Guido and Rankin have legitimate grounds for a lawsuit? The district is a public employer, making its size irrelevant. ... The district has already been sued for the same issue by other former employees.
Explanation:
Answer:
perceived behavioral control
Explanation:
According to my research on the theory of planned behavior, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the factor most likely to interfere with Tom quitting smoking is his perceived behavioral control. This is defined as the individuals perception of believing whether or not a behavior is within their control. If Tom does not believe quitting smoking is in his control, then he will not be able to quit regardless of how many people tell him how important it is to do so.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.