1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lorasvet [3.4K]
4 years ago
6

Susan Sheppard, Creative Design Manager at Word-of-Mouth Marketing Group, is consistently bullied by her colleague, Alexandra Wo

odward, the boss's sister. Alexandra has been working at the firm a little over a month, after quitting her job as a Rare Artifacts Curator at the Museum of Indigenous Culture. During her short time at Word-of-Mouth, she has shown a propensity for "self-governance" and defiance. Extra work has been heaped on Sheppard, and she has had to face sarcasm and a constant barrage of inappropriate comments from her newly appointed subordinate.
Alexandra is constantly creating more work for Susan, yet Susan completes all of this additional work and, in turn, Alexandra continues her behavior. Which of the following methods to reward performance explains why Alexandra continues this behavior?

A) Punishment
B) Positive Reinforcement
C) Extinction
D) Probation
E) Negative Reinforcement
Business
1 answer:
Vikentia [17]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Negative reinforcement

Explanation:

Negative reinforcement is a behavioral psychology principle that occur when one's action allows  him / her to escape an unfavorable action before it occurs.

It is mentioned in the scenario that Sheppad  is being bullied and criticized  by Alexandra  , being the boss's sister .

Susan's idea of completing all work including the extras is a behavior intentionally put up to escape the constant unpleasant stimuli from Sheppad.

You might be interested in
Who's copping the candy axe?
drek231 [11]

Answer:

not me

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Terrance has just signed a contract with a bank to get a loan to buy a new house. What is TRUE about this contract? A. Both the
borishaifa [10]

Answer: C. Both parties now have an obligation to their agreement.

Explanation:

When parties get into a contract, they have a legal obligation to each other to fulfill their part of the agreement or the other party will be able to seek redress in a court of law.

Terrance and the bank are now parties to an agreement to provide Terrence with a loan to buy a house. The bank will have to fulfill this obligation by giving Terrence the loan and Terrence will fulfill his side of the agreement by making payments as stipulated in the loan covenant.

5 0
3 years ago
Gray is a 50% partner in Fabco Partnership. Gray's tax basis in Fabco on January 1, year 4, was $5,000. Fabco made no distributi
arsen [322]

Answer:

$21000

Explanation:

To determine Gray’s tax basis  for a 50% interest in the Fabco Partnership, The interest is increased by the partner’s  distributive share of all partnership items of income and decreased by the partner’s distributive share of all loss and  deduction items.

Gray’s beginning basis = $5,000  

Gray’s 50% distributive share of ordinary  income = 50% × $20000 = $10000

Gray’s 50% tax-exempt income= 50% × $8000 = $4,000 and  

portfolio income = 50% × $4000  = $2,000

Therefore, the ending basis of  Gray’s Fabco partnership interest = $5000 + $10000 + $4000 + $2000 = $21000

6 0
3 years ago
You are tasked with generating twice the amount of qualified leads your company generated last quarter. With your company’s bott
Alexxx [7]

Answer:

b. You could increase the chances of your current traffic choosing to convert and move down your funnel

Explanation:

This has the ability over time to significantly lower the cost of acquiring a customer and to have a positive impact on your return on investment.

5 0
3 years ago
A 60-year-old man develops lung cancer, and sues the manufacturer of an asbestos-containing material. The man worked in construc
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:

Weak because of proximate cause is difficult to prove in absence of other similarly affected individuals

Explanation:

Since in the question it is mentioned that the 60 year old man have a lung cancer so he sues the asbestos manufacturer also he trust that it is unsafe as her friend who use the alternative material has not have a lung cancer so here the case would be weak as of proximate cause as it is difficult for proving it

Therefore the same is to be considered

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the product development process, what takes place between concept testing and market testing?
    9·1 answer
  • Prepare journal entries to record the following four separate issuances of stock.
    11·1 answer
  • On October 1st, a company received $30,000 in cash and a building worth $200,000, and in return, issued common stock to an inves
    9·1 answer
  • Stock Investment Transactions On September 12, 2,000 shares of Aspen Company were acquired at a price of $50 per share plus a $2
    9·1 answer
  • The scale of a timeline is generally unimportant.
    9·1 answer
  • What is the primary benefit of activity-based costing? Arbitrary allocations of overhead costs All these are primary benefits of
    6·1 answer
  • Show the effect of each transaction on the three basic accounting elements by indicating the dollar amount of the increase or de
    11·1 answer
  • How does consumer law damage business?
    9·1 answer
  • Which category of inventory holding costs has a much higher percentage than average for rapid-change industries such as PCs and
    7·1 answer
  • What is defined as the perceptions a company's employees share about the firm's psychological environment
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!