Answer:
decreased by 20%
Explanation:
Supposed we have input price of $30,000 and it produced an output of 300 units on the first year of operation. The cost per unit on the first year is $100 each ($30,000/300).
On the second year we still have the same input expense of $30,000 but the productivity output increased by 25%. So we have 375 units produced on the second year’s operation. The new cost per unit would be $30,000/375=$80 per unit.
Therefore we conclude that based on the example given, the new unit cost per product decreases by 20%.
$100-80 = $20
$20/$100 = 20%
Answer:
-3.41%
Explanation:
The computation of the annual rate of return is shown below;
We use the formula:
Future value = Present value × (1 + rate of interest)^number of years
$10,710,500 = $12,738,500 × (1 + rate of interest)^5
($10,710,500 ÷ $12,738,500)^(1 ÷ 5) = (1 + rate of interest)
(1 + rate of interest) = 0.965913622
r = (0.965913622 - 1) × 100
= -3.41%
Answer: Introduction phase.
Explanation:
Campbell's company is going through the introduction phase of it's development cycle. In the introduction phase, a business; builds it's customer base, makes very little or no profit, observes slow growth rate and the running cost is usually high, but the business tends to stabilize as it enters the growth phase.
Answer:
$22
Explanation:
Given that,
Acquisition cost of product ALPHA = $24
Net realizable value for product ALPHA = $23
Normal profit for product ALPHA = $1.00
Market value (replacement cost) for product ALPHA = $21
By applying LCM, the per unit inventory value is determined by deducting the normal profit from the Net realizable value for product.
Per unit inventory value:
= Net Realizable Value - Normal Profit
= $23 - $1.00
= $22
Therefore, the proper per unit inventory value for product ALPHA applying LCM is $22.00.
Answer:
The answer is T that is (True)
Explanation:
First of all, we need to understand that internal control in technology advanced accounting system are designed policies and procedures integrated into the system to give it integrity and reliability.
The purpose are mainly to curb but not limited to issues like fraud, generating timely and effective reporting, reassuring investors, give a forensic over view of business operation success and proactively identify financial challenges.
The internal controls in advanced accounting can either be preventative, consequentially deterring fraud and mistakes, or detective, consequentially identifying challenges after they have occurred
This two aforementioned objective of the internal control in technology advanced accounting are embedded in the design and operation of the system stage, thereby confirming the statement to be true that Internal control in technologically advanced accounting systems depends more on the design and operation of the information system and less on the analysis of its resulting documents
