1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rewona [7]
3 years ago
6

"In American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, American Express (Amex) entered into agreements with Italian Colors Restauran

t and other merchants that accept American Express credit cards. The agreement required that all disputes be settled through arbitration and prohibited class actions. The merchants filed a class action antitrust claim against Amex, arguing that they should be allowed to bring the claim as a class because the cost of expert analysis to prove the case exceeded the maximum recovery available to an individual merchant plaintiff. How did the U.S. Supreme Court decide?
Law
1 answer:
natita [175]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Express (Amex)

Explanation:

The sequence of decisions is reproduced as follows;

1.The trail court ruled in favor of Amex

2. On petition to federal court by the other party, the federal court reversed and overturned the decision of trial court and decided that the clause was not forcible because of the exorbitant cost structure and scenario.

3.U.S Supreme again ruled in favor of Amex where U.S supreme court upheld that Federal Arbitration Act does not allow the judiciary to null and void a contractual relinquishment of the legal rights based merely on the grounds that Italian colors restaurant's dispute resolution costs exceed any potential amounts to be recovered.    

You might be interested in
Everyone that reading this inspiring message,Lets start off with learning students that are smart, and students that are sufferi
lbvjy [14]

Answer:

Don't worry about it.....

6 0
3 years ago
Which type of agreements do some clients make their security agents sign?
zmey [24]

Answer: Confidentiality / Non-Disclosure agreements

Explanation:

We've all watched movies where people discuss very secretive things over the phone or with another person while they are being driven and at some point we wonder why those discussing are not worried about the driver spilling the beans.

The reason is because these high-profile clients need to protect their privacy and so make sure that those working for them especially their security agents, sign Non-Disclosure or Confidentiality agreements that require them not to speak of the things they hear or see about their clients.

Should they breach this agreement, they will be in a wealth of legal problems as well as suffer reputational loss. Sometimes though this does not seem to work and they still breach the agreement. It is a good deterrent either way.

4 0
3 years ago
Why might it be better for all people to believe there is only one God who is like a person rather than a part of the natural wo
mixer [17]

Answer:

Why might it be better for all people to believe there is only one God who is like a person rather than a part of the natural world?

Explanation:

Some people, having realized that no one will ever find true happiness and perfect prosperity without God or outside God, seek to find him in spiritual ways according to their particular abilities. This is one reason that we've generated many different religions and ideas of God.

5 0
3 years ago
Degree felony; punishable by 5-99yrs in prison
andriy [413]
Felonies are the most serious class of criminal offense. They are generally defined as crimes punishable by imprisonment of more than one year, and the prison sentences are usually served in a federal or state penitentiary rather than a county jail. :)) oop
5 0
3 years ago
Gautreaux v. Chicago housing authority was a class action suit that alleged that public housing was, in effect.
borishaifa [10]

Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority class action lawsuit that alleged public housing was serving de facto govt. segregation. -gave $ to families to help buy homes in suburbs. as a result, happier, healthier, children had higher test scores.

About case :

The case began in 1966, when Dorothy Gautreaux and others filed a class action claiming that the Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”) had intentionally perpetuated racial segregation both in its tenant assignment practices and in its siting policies.   In 1969, the district court found for the plaintiff class, Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Auth.,

Who is Dorothy Gautreaux?

Dorothy Gautreaux was a community and civil rights activist who lived in public housing on Chicago's South Side, and fought against their unjust policies. Under the guidance of ACLU lawyers, Gautreaux and 3 other residents sued the Chicago Housing Authority in the nation's first public housing desegregation lawsuit.

Learn more about Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority :

brainly.com/question/28161937

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • PLZ HELP!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • Jordan files for bankruptcy because he has debts of $1 million that he cannot pay. He would like to sign a document to assure hi
    8·2 answers
  • What are the feature of common stock?​
    13·1 answer
  • Men convicted of crimes of passion have ____brain levels
    7·2 answers
  • Carlos pays a restaurant that already has an operational format, logo, and recipes to use their models and materials to open his
    9·1 answer
  • After your case is reviewed by the District Court of Appeals and they determine not to
    7·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST!!
    10·1 answer
  • A police officer is struggling to arrest a man who has just assaulted a shopkeeper you see the police officer kneeling on the de
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following are indicators of
    5·1 answer
  • What happens when a president doesn’t return a bill in 10 days and what is the exception to that rule?.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!