1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rewona [7]
2 years ago
6

"In American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, American Express (Amex) entered into agreements with Italian Colors Restauran

t and other merchants that accept American Express credit cards. The agreement required that all disputes be settled through arbitration and prohibited class actions. The merchants filed a class action antitrust claim against Amex, arguing that they should be allowed to bring the claim as a class because the cost of expert analysis to prove the case exceeded the maximum recovery available to an individual merchant plaintiff. How did the U.S. Supreme Court decide?
Law
1 answer:
natita [175]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Express (Amex)

Explanation:

The sequence of decisions is reproduced as follows;

1.The trail court ruled in favor of Amex

2. On petition to federal court by the other party, the federal court reversed and overturned the decision of trial court and decided that the clause was not forcible because of the exorbitant cost structure and scenario.

3.U.S Supreme again ruled in favor of Amex where U.S supreme court upheld that Federal Arbitration Act does not allow the judiciary to null and void a contractual relinquishment of the legal rights based merely on the grounds that Italian colors restaurant's dispute resolution costs exceed any potential amounts to be recovered.    

You might be interested in
How did this supreme court decision affect judicial interpretations of the constitution?.
lisabon 2012 [21]
The Supreme Court's responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary consequence of its sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.
5 0
2 years ago
How would a jury determine that a person had no control of themselves when they committed a crime?
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

I beleive the answer is C

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Why is it important to carefully document an interview? a. You can learn from the problems and successes during the interview b.
9966 [12]

Answer:

All of the above are why it is important to carefully document an interview: You can learn from the problems and successes during the interview. It can help you determine if the company is the right fit for you.

8 0
2 years ago
Harvey is a resident of California. Harvey files an action in Orange County Superior Court, California against Microsoft allegin
enyata [817]

Answer:

They would not win the motion.

Explanation:

Due that Harvey is a resident he can file it their.

5 0
3 years ago
What dose a yellow sign mean when driving
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

i think it is a general warning sign

Explanation:

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Methods of controlling mosquito breed<br>​
    7·2 answers
  • 1.Each state has its own constitution, separate from the United States Constitution. What do you think States would include in t
    5·1 answer
  • How did the domino theory influence united states foreign policy?
    5·1 answer
  • Off the four purposes of the U.S criminal justice system, is there one that seems nobler than the others Explain?
    11·1 answer
  • Which court takes the burden off of higher courts
    11·1 answer
  • .<br> One of alcohol's effects is to
    10·1 answer
  • What did the USA Patriot Act empower law enforcement agencies to do?a. Convict U.S. citizens without trial.b. Wiretap and spy on
    9·1 answer
  • Which is direct evidence:
    11·2 answers
  • Which type of breaching is the least used?
    7·1 answer
  • What is your ideal society? explain.​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!