Answer: $324,800
Explanation:
It is a general Principle that when calculating income tax expense, that the Extraordinary loss is treated separately because it is not a usual thing.
The income gained from changing the Accounting principle is not included as well.
The Taxable income to be recorded therefore is,
Taxable income = Income + Gain on disposal - Unusual loss (due to its infrequency)
Taxable income = 928,000 + 32,000 - 148,000
Taxable income = $812,000
Tax expense would therefore be,
= 812,000 * 40%
= $324,800
$324,800 is the amount of income tax expense Arreaga would report on its income statement.
Answer:
the firm's contribution margin per composite unit is $8,775
Explanation:
The computation of the firm's contribution margin per composite unit is given below:
= $165 × 5 + $510 × 9 + $560 × 6
= $825 + $4,590 + $3,360
= $8,775
Hence, the firm's contribution margin per composite unit is $8,775
Therefore the same is to be considered and relevant
Answer:
b. Only Emerald Corporation's current ratio will be increased.
Explanation:
Given that
Emerald current ratio is
= 0.5 i.e. = 0.5 ÷ 1
now in case when the current liability is doubles , so the current assets is
= 0.5 + 1 = 1.5
And, the cuurrent liabilities is
= 1 + 1
= 2
so new ratio is
= 1.5 ÷ 2
= 0.75
Now
Ruby current ratio is
= 1.5
i.e. = 1.5 ÷ 1
Now in case when the current liability is doubled,
the current assets is
= 1.5 + 1
= 2.5
And, current liabilities is
= 1 + 1
= 2
Now new ratio is
= 2.5 ÷ 2
= 1.25
Therefore the emerald current ratio is rised from 0.5 to 0.75
And, the Ruby's ratio has decline from 1.5 to 1.25
Answer:
Predetermined overhead rate
Explanation:
The predetermined overhead rate is the rate that is computed by taking the estimated manufacturing overhead and the same would be divided by allocation factor that could be estimated direct labor, estimated direct hours, etc in order to assign the overhead cost
So according to the given situation, the first option is correct i.e. predetermined overhead rate
I'd say B, by leasing the car he'd save more money if it broke down or stopped functioning properly and if that happened he could lease a different car instead of paying multiple times to fix things that would most likely break down again because he owned it.