Need help on this question
1 answer:
Answers
A. Yes
B. Yes
C. No
D. No
=======================================================
x = number of minutes
y = amount of rope uncoiled
At first we have 50 feet of uncoiled rope. So basically at time x = 0 we have y = 50 feet of uncoiled rope. The point (0,50) is on the line. After 5 minutes, 5*10 = 50 feet of rope is coiled up, as its coiled at 10 ft/min. After these 5 minutes, we have 0 feet of uncoiled rope. The point (5,0) is on the line.
The line goes through (0,50) and (5,0)
Now go through the window options and see which provide the right window to be able to see the line segment with the endpoints mentioned.
- Choice A = yes, because y = 50 is part of the interval
- Choice B = yes, similar reasons as choice A
- Choice C = no, due to the fact that y = 50 is too large and outside the interval
- Choice D = no, same reasoning as choice C
You might be interested in
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.