Answer:
Explanation:Last Friday was a big day for voting rights in the United States. Federal courts struck down restrictive voting laws in Kansas and Wisconsin. And in a particularly important decision, the fourth circuit court of appeals delivered a stinging rebuke to North Carolina’s egregious vote suppression law. As the court observed, North Carolina legislators didn’t even try to hide the core purpose of the law: to stop African Americans from getting to the polls.
The politics of North Carolina are a perfect illustration of what led the Republican party to nominate Trump. The southern state, which has seen a large influx of people into its prosperous urban centers, is becoming more liberal – Barack Obama carried the state in 2008, and Mitt Romney carried it by only two points in 2012. North Carolina Republicans have not reacted to these trends, however, by becoming more moderate.
The clash between a Republican party running at full speed to the right while its population was trending to the left led North Carolina to pass a particularly terrible anti-voting law. In 2013, a bare majority of the US supreme court gave the green light to North Carolina by striking down a provision of the Voting Rights Act that required states, such as North Carolina, that had a history of discrimination to preclear electoral law changes with the Department of Justice.
In addition to a requirement that voters show particular forms of ID, the state eliminated Sunday voting, narrowed the window for early voting and eliminated same-day vote registration and early registration for 16- and 17-year olds. Voter ID requirements at least have the superficial appearance of addressing the integrity of elections, although in practice the justification is bogus. But most of the provisions in North Carolina’s attack on the right to vote had no purpose, even in theory, other than to make it harder for people to vote.
The United States dropped nuclear weapons on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki<span> on August 6 and 9, 1945, respectively, during the final stage of </span>World War II. <span>The </span>two<span> bombings, which killed at least 129,000 people, remain the only </span>use of<span> nuclear weapons for warfare in history.</span>
<h2>Answer:</h2>
It might make it harder to farm and take care of animals with men off fighting.
Supplies, like food, flour, or candles, might run out.
Fighting might take place in fields, destroying crops.
People might have to do without the things they need.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The country suffers from war faces lot of issues like ruining of homes and properties, destroy of crops, shortage of supplies like food, flour and other stuff. People might work without the things they require.
The Civil War hit life on the home front as well as the battleground. Families throughout the North and South suffered deficiencies of supplies, had their fields and homes ruined, or in some situations seized to be practiced for the war effort. Work of women and children changed in all aspects. For the first time, many women gained authority of farms or properties, served as nurses on and off the battleground, and even challenged in combat. Families were split separate as loved ones were forwarded off to fight.
Answer:
An elected legislator
-More personal freedoms
-Better working conditions.
Explanation:
Got it correct.
Cortes was interested in converting natives to Christianity
