This is a very ethically question and I am not sure of the exactly correct answer but if it's open to your own answer, I took a course and there was like an answer:
So, to know if a decision or view is "good" the 4 tests of truth can be applied
1. The test of reason (is it reasonable? Can it be logically stated and defended?)
2. The test of the outer world (Is there some external, corroborating evidence to support it?)
3. The test of the inner world (Does it adequately address the "victories, disappointments, blessings, crises, and relationships of our everyday world"?
4. The test of the real world (Are its consequences good or bad when applied in any given cultural context?)
But, as it says, for this - the whole society - the test of the real word would do.
Hope this helps
<span>One basic argument for intermediate sanctions is that probation, as traditionally practiced, is inadequate for a large number of criminal offenders. ​Probation in criminal law is a period of supervision over an offender, ordered by the court instead of serving time in prison</span>
Answer:
A-It leaves unanswered questions in the reader's mind
Explanation:
The Articles of confederation was considered to be weak and ineffectual so, Constitutional convention decided to transform it.
Federalists, who were strong supporters of the constitution deliberated that incorporation of Bill of rights would stand to be a barrier which would give a vague representation of the constitution. However after great deliberations they conceded to incorporate Bill of rights which were a series of amendments and this decision was to appease the anti-federalists who recommended the inclusion of Bill of rights. Federalists supported for the strong federal Government which has the power to raise an army, impose taxes and execute laws.
Anti-federalists fought for strong state governments as they were apprehended that the constitution may carry an element of despotism which was during the British rule and hence asked for representation of states.
Finally, the founding fathers concluded that each small state has a vote and they can form the senate and big states were given two votes and they were eligible to form the lower house. Thus the final outline of the Constitution was formed.
