The problems with price gouging laws that keep prices low are:
- Price gouging laws do nothing to address the underlying issues that cause shortages after a disaster. In fact, they often make the problem worse.
- When prices rise after a disaster, producers are encouraged to produce more of the good and bring it to the disaster area; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
Here are the options to this questions:
- Price gouging laws reduce shortages after a disaster by keeping prices low.
- Price gouging laws do nothing to address the underlying issues that cause shortages after a disaster. In fact, they often make the problem worse.
- When prices rise after a disaster, producers are encouraged to produce more of the good and bring it to the disaster area; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
- When prices rise after a disaster, consumers are encouraged to consume less of the good and leave some for others to purchase; price gouging laws short circuit this effect.
- Price gouging laws keep prices low after a disaster. This forces producers to produce more of the needed goods
- Price gouging laws keep prices low after a disaster. This forces consumers to buy less of the good than they otherwise would
Price gouging is when the price of a good or a service is increased to very high levels when the demand for the product is higher than the supply of the product. Price gouging usually occurs after an event. For example, after a natural disaster.
In order to prevent price gouging, the government can set a price ceiling. A price ceiling is when the maximum price for a good or service is set by the government. When prices are prevented from rising above a particular price, this benefits consumers as they would be able to purchase goods at a cheaper price. But producers would be disadvantaged because their profit margins would fall. This can lead to a shortage problem as demand would exceed supply.
To learn more about price gouging, please check: brainly.com/question/10477659?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The amount of rent expense that will be reported on the Year 1 income statement is $1,800
.
The cash outflow for rent that would be reported on the Year 1 statement of cash flows is $5,400.
Explanation:
Though the amount paid was paid on October 1, Year 1 it will only be expensed from October to December for year 1.
The duration of the payment is 12 months, hence
Monthly amortization = $7,200/12 = $600
Rent expense for year 1 = $600 × 3 = $1,800
The ending balance in the prepaid rent account will be
= $7,200 - $1,800
= $5,400
This will be the cash outflow for rent that would be reported on the Year 1 statement of cash flows.
Answer:
7.31%
Explanation:
The question is pointing at the bond's yield to maturity.
The yield to maturity can be computed using the rate formula in excel as provided below:
=rate(nper,pmt,-pv,fv)
nper is the number of times the bond would pay annual coupons which is 31
pmt is the annual coupon payment i.e $1000*8.0%=$80.00
pv is the current price of the bond which is $1,084
fv is the face value of the bond which is $1,000
=rate(31,80,-1084,1000)=7.31%
The yield to maturity is 7.31%
That is the annual rate of return for an investor that holds the bond till maturity.
Answer:
Cash flow <em>generated </em>from financing activities 400,000
Cash flow <em>used </em>in Investing activities 7,800,000
Explanation:
700,000 debt receive
-500,000 dividends paid
200,000 other adjustment on Financing
400,000 TOTAL CASH GENERATED
-8,300,000 purchase of PPE
500,000 other adjustment on Inventing
-7,800,000 TOTAL CASH USED
<u>Notice: </u>There is no hint about the adjustment being related as negative, so it should be assuem are positive cashflow.
