Answer:
The hypothesis can be made as follows:
' If there are less or no estuaries in a river, then there will be more erosion at the shorelines.'
A hypothesis is a tentative statement which can either be supported through experiments or proven to be wrong.
In the following scenario, we can conduct experiments by taking into observation those rivers which have estuaries and those which do not have estuaries. We can then compare the erosion of the shorelines of the rivers to validate our hypothesis.
Answer:
a. destroyed
b. osteoclasts
c. proteolytic enzymes
d. hydrochloric acid
e. blood
f. low
Explanation:
Resorption is the loss of substance from any mineralized tissue, mediated by cellular and humoral systems of their own. The four mineralized tissues of our economy, bone, cement, dentin (mineralized fraction of the dentino-pulp functional complex) and enamel, offer different degrees of resistance to resorption. The bone has the greatest lability and the enamel the least. The fact that the bone tissue is the least resistant to resorption is used to move and reposition teeth by controlled forces (orthodontics); and the fact that the enamel is the most resistant has led to think that it does not suffer from resorption.
Osteoclasts They are the spring cells par excellence; they belong to the lineage of the monocitomacrophages. They are large, multinucleated mobile cells, with a clear area and a rough brush border that live for about two weeks and disappear by apoptosis (cell death programmed by fragmentation in membrane particles that allows their phagocytosis without inflammation). They are responsible for the destruction of the organic and inorganic parts of the mineralized bone fraction. They are active both in the processes of the physiological renewal of the bone and in those of its pathological loss.
I would say a beacause tundra is very cold desert snd only certain amount of vegetation can happen
Answer:Just after
Explanation:As the prey population rises the more food there is for the Lynx
