Answer:
Legal
Explanation:
According to the "fill in the blanks" basis, the definition that would work best for this answer is the one that deals with "legal", keeping in mind that statistics are not up to be absolutely true as they do not cover the whole situation when talking about specific matters, or they fall in the total opposite, assuming a matter as if it was entirely absolute and standardized.
Answer:
Everyone in the United States deserves to be covered by national health insurance.
Explanation:
Quite simply, a normative statement answers "what should be?" In all 4 options, the statement 'a' is showing a person's opinion of how things should be. And that is what a normative statement is. When people give their opinions, and you cannot make sense whether they're right or wrong. They're simply put, perspectives.
Tyranny is the technical form, although a noun would be a dictator. Synonym could be domination. Not sure exactly which word you're looking for, but hope this helps!
Answer: Wendy did not use random assignment
Explanation: Wendy's failure to randomly assign participants or subject to his research will pose a threat to the internal validity of his study. The internal validity of a study simply refers to the structure of an experiment and it's trustworthiness in establishing causal relationship between the applied treatment used a study and the observed outcome. Wendy's decision to ignore random assignment and opt for a manual assignment of subject to each treatment will pose a threat to the structure of his study and hence the establishment of a causal relationship between the treatment t and outcome of the study.
