I believe the answer is: <span> Involuntary manslaughter
</span><span> Involuntary manslaughter could be charged if the person committed an act that took other people's life even though he/she has no intention to do it.
</span>In united states, people who convicted with <span> Involuntary manslaughter would be punished with a minimum of 1 year jail time and other types of fines plus probations.</span>
A politician who tend to use an event like a mass shooting to mourn the victims and celebrate their lives while avoiding advancing any changes to gun laws is using the kind of epideictic rhetoric.
So here one of the three branches or species of rhetoric are said to have been described in Aristotle's Rhetoric. Thus, in order to be used to praise or blame during ceremonies, this is called epideictic oratory.
However, here the purpose of the epideictic rhetoric, which is said to focus on the present, is used in order to emphasize and characterize what makes a person or thing outstanding. So, here an example of a politician is given.
Hence, epideictic rhetoric is said to be demonstrated by what happens after a person has passed away.
To learn more about Aristotle here:
brainly.com/question/5399979
#SPJ4
Answer:
Is it to enforce the law?
Explanation:
Answer:
Constitution of 1890
Explanation:
The constitution of 1890 put literacy test as a requirement for people before they were allowed to cast their votes during the election.
At that time, the constitution was designed to reduce the power of minorities vote in the government.
A lot of black citizens during that time period did not have access to education due to their poor economic condition. As a result, black communities had a high illiteracy rate compared to white communities. This made a lot of black people unable to cast of their votes and choose their representatives within the government.
