All categories

3 years ago

Can instantaneous velocity ever be negative?

Physics

2 answers:

kirill115 [55]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

yes, explained

Explanation:

The instantaneous velocity of an object can be negative. Even though the average velocity of the object in an entire trip is positive, the instantaneous velocity can be negative if the object is moving in negative direction. This direction depends upon the observer. If he considers direction away from him in the right as positive then the direction towards him in the left is negative.

SSSSS [86.1K]3 years ago

4 0

Instantaneous velocity in definition is the average velocity in given particular moment time. Hence, it underlies the context of each velocity at each occupied time and space at that particular moment where you are. Moreover, talking about velocity is vector quantity, which means it both has magnitude and direction. Furthermore, this positive and negative sign attributed to their number means only the specific direction in which the object is going. For example in analogy to average velocity, the initial position of the object at the moment is 2 m/s to the right then the object suddenly changes his position to 3 m/s to the left as his final position. Which is, the exact opposite of the former direction then indicates that the final position is negative, contrary to the initial direction. Just remember that the negative values connoted on the numbers can indicate the opposite direction of either the initial position or an object is downward.

You might be interested in

As you may well know, placing metal objects inside a microwave oven can generate sparks. Two of your friends are arguing over th

Fofino [41]

Answer:

$5.04\cdot 10^8 A$

Explanation:

The work function of the metal corresponds to the minimum energy needed to extract a photoelectron from the metal. In this case, it is:

$\phi = 3.950\cdot 10^{-19}J$

So, the energy of the incoming photon hitting on the metal must be at least equal to this value.

The energy of a photon is given by

$E=\frac{hc}{\lambda}$

where

h is the Planck's constant

c is the speed of light

$\lambda$ is the wavelength of the photon

Using $E=\phi$ and solving for $\lambda$ , we find the maximum wavelength of the radiation that will eject electrons from the metal:

$\lambda=\frac{hc}{E}=\frac{(6.63\cdot 10^{-34} Js)(3\cdot 10^8 m/s)}{3.950\cdot 10^{-19} J}=5.04\cdot 10^{-7}m$

And since

1 angstrom = $10^{-15}m$

The wavelength in angstroms is

$\lambda=\frac{5.04\cdot 10^{-7} m}{10^{-15} m/A}=5.04\cdot 10^8 A$

3 0

3 years ago

Pls helpppppp i’ll give brainliest

Tema [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

The answer is Niels Bohr's planetary model, the difference between this model and all of the other models is that the Bohr's PM Is more of layers of

Nucleus - Protons and Neutrons

Electron Orbital - Period 1 Elements

2 electrons

Electron Orbital - Period 2 Elements

8 electrons

Electron Orbital - Period 3 Elements

8 electrons

If that made sense-

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Forces normal to a particle's displacement do no work.

snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

The work done is defined as the product of force applied in the direction of displacement and the displacement.

W = F x d x Cosθ

where, F is the force applied, d be the displacement and θ be the angle between the displacement and force.

For the normal forces, the angle between the displacement and the force applied is 90 degree, and the value of Cos 90 is zero, so the work done is zero.

3 0

3 years ago

A wire carries a steady current of 2.60 A. A straight section of the wire is 0.750 m long and lies along the x axis within a uni

ad-work [718]

Answer:

The magnetic force on the section of wire is $-2.925\hat{j}\ N$ .