Dutch researcher Geert Hofstede identified four cultural dimensions by studying data on IBM employees from dozens of countries.
The original theory has four dimensions along which cultural values identified as:
- individualism-collectivism
- uncertainty avoidance
- power distance in social hierarchy
- masculinity-femininity
Hofstede's theory is used to understand the differences in cultures round the globe. He started this model on the basis of dissimilarities in values and beliefs relating work goals. The aim of this model was to determine the dimensions in which cultures vary from each other . It is important because it gives useful information regarding variances between countries' culture, values and beliefs and how to manage such cultural differences".
To learn more about Hofstede's Theory,
brainly.com/question/14453085
#SPJ4
Work, for example is the subject of an entire branch of psychology. psychological, behavioural, emotional, and social factors.
The correct answer is C) intermediate scrutiny test.
A law that placed restrictions on courses girls could take in high school would be evaluated by the courts using the intermediate scrutiny test.
We are talking about the kind of test the Court uses to determine the constitutionality of a statute. When the members of the Court need to make a decision, this test is a tool they have to help them decide if a statute passed by the federal government or a state affects in a negative way some protected classes such as the case of the courses girls could take in high school.
<h2>Hope this helps you with your homework :)</h2>
Answer:
The correct answer is: c) avoidance-avoidance
Explanation:
In psychological theory, a conflict is though of as the arousal of two or more issues that cannot be simultaneously solved, creating a struggle. Conflict theory suggests the existence of different types of conflict, including: approach-approach, approach-avoidance, avoidance-avoidance and double-avoidance.
The avoidance-avoidance confict refers to a situation where there's a conflict between two equally undesirable dangers or threats, both of which the person wants to avoid. In this example, the males in the 1960s were faced with two equally undesirable choices.