1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
3 years ago
9

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 20 POINTS! Describe a time when you used repetition to help you remember information. Was this a useful

technique for you? Why or why not?
History
2 answers:
EleoNora [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

here's a good one my ninjas

Explanation:

Repetition works well because it helps your brain solidify connections that are used to recall memories. When you learn something new, your brain instantly attempts to associate it with something that you already know through a process of assimilation.

stepladder [879]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Once when preparing for a Spanish test I used repetition to help me study. This technique was useful for me, because when I wrote out vocabulary words and continued to review them until the day of the test it helped me remember the words a lot easier.

You might be interested in
What prior knowledge can you apply to this passage? People can change—but they don’t always like it Humans are amazing in how ad
Romashka [77]

Answer:

Through effective electronic communication students can establish new friendships and tackle difficult problems from the viewpoint of students from different cultures. Pupils and staff gain first-hand knowledge of other education systems, customs and the reality of life in a country different from their own.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What was the status of enslaved people after the Thirteenth Amendment was passed?
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

Explanation:

They were no longer 'slaves' after the 13th amendment but we're still not citizens of the U.S.A until the Fourteenth amendment took place.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a major obstacle to drafting a new constitution at the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
arsen [322]

Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.

The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size.  Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.

The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.

  • The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
4 0
3 years ago
What is the largest ethnic group in indonesia
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

The Javanese

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Why did the south oppose the Wilmot Proviso bill in Congress?
Vesna [10]
The South opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it would have prevented any new territories from having slavery in them.

In 1846, Congressman David Wilmot of Pennsylvania introduced the proviso as an amendment to an appropriations bill in connection with the peace treaty being negotiated with Mexico.  His amendment stipulated that any territory gained from Mexico would be free, not allowing slavery.  The specific language of the proviso went like this:
<span><em>Provided, That, as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the party shall first be duly convicted</em>.
</span>
Wilmot's amendment passed in the House of Representatives, but was unable to get approval in the Senate.  The high-intensity debate over slavery and the expansion of slavery was evidenced by how things went with the "Wilmot Proviso."
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me!!!! Which of the four case studies (Italy, Germany, Dual Monarchy, Ottoman Empire) of nationalism was the most su
    10·1 answer
  • Who were NOT partners during WWI?
    15·2 answers
  • Who was president in 1914
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the United States declare war against Spain in 1898? Choose all answers that are correct. American newspaper publishers
    10·1 answer
  • Write three sample research questions about the Black Death.
    12·2 answers
  • List three traits that Ghana, Mali, and Songhai share
    12·1 answer
  • When did slavery end
    12·2 answers
  • What was Henry Clay’s plan to improve U.S. roads and canals part of?
    6·2 answers
  • Who do you believe won the space race? why?​
    11·1 answer
  • Sorry this is English
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!