1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yan [13]
3 years ago
11

Why did New York, Massachusetts, Virginia, and Rhode Island wait so long to ratify the Constitution?

History
2 answers:
nikitadnepr [17]3 years ago
8 0
Because they wanted a bill of rights to be added to the constitution
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  They wanted to add the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

  These states refused to ratify the U.S. Constitution because they considered that it failed to reserve undelegated power to the States, lacked protection to the basic political rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and press. In February of 1788, these states signed a compromise under which they would ratify the Constitution with the assurance that amendments were immediately proposed.

  The United States Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. It adds specific guarantees of personal and political rights and freedoms, a clear limitation on the government´s power in judicial and other proceedings. And an explicit declaration of federalism, all powers not granted to the U.S. Congress were reserved for the States or the people.

  I hope this answer helps you.

You might be interested in
If anyone can tell me what my face looks like, then you are a good explorer
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

it looks like old man

I think don't be sad I just kidding

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Witch amendment abolished slavery? Which amendment gave women the right to vote
marta [7]

Answer:

the 13th amendment and the second one would be the 19th amendment.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect do you think the sumptuary laws had<br> on members of the Third Estate?
Jet001 [13]

Answer:     Sumptuary laws (from Latin sumptuāriae lēgēs) are laws that try to regulate consumption. Black's Law Dictionary defines them as "Laws made for the purpose of restraining luxury or extravagance, particularly against inordinate expenditures for apparel, food, furniture, etc." Historically, they were intended to regulate and reinforce social hierarchies and morals through restrictions on clothing, food, and luxury expenditures, often depending on a person's social rank.

5 0
3 years ago
What circumstance led to Mark being outside of Paul's favor? How do we know this problem was resolved? Include scripture referen
Tamiku [17]

You can check in Acts 13:5 that John, or Mark, was accompanying Paul and Barnabas. John eventually left them though, as it can be seen in Acts 13:13.

<em>"From Paphos, Paul and his companions sailed to Perga in Pamphylia, where John left them to return to Jerusalem" </em>

When Paul and Barnabas planned another trip, Barnabas wanted John to accompany them, but Paul refused. He did not want someone who left them. Because of that, they went separated ways. Paul went with Silas, Barnabas with Mark.

When Paul wrote a epistle to the Colossians, he included a commendation of Mark in (as you can see in Colossians 4:10). It most likely means that the earlier contention was eventually resolved.

3 0
3 years ago
Money is shared out between Paul and Helen in the ratio of 3:4 Helen receives £16 How much did Helen receive
sattari [20]

Answer:

Paul share = £12

Explanation:

Given:

Sharing ratio = 3:4

Helen receives = £16

Find:

How much did Paul receive

Computation:

Paul share = 3/(3+4)

Paul share = 3/7

Total amount = 16[7/4]

Total amount = 28

Paul share = 28[3/7]

Paul share = £12

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is the Suez Canal so important to the Middle East region?
    14·1 answer
  • How civics play a role in your personal life
    12·2 answers
  • What senator proposed policies to improve the national economy known as the American system?
    5·2 answers
  • After World War II, African and Asian leaders identified? as the defining theme of their new political cultures
    13·2 answers
  • In 1861, Sam Houston was A. elected governor B. removed as governor. C. impeached by the assembly. D. elected president of the C
    13·1 answer
  • HELP please I’ll make u the brainliest if right
    8·2 answers
  • Plzzz need Asap <br><br>who were meer jafar and robert clive ??
    11·1 answer
  • List three facts that you learned about the history of swimming. Were any of these surprising to you? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
  • What territorial changes resulted from the Peace of Westphalia, ending the 30 Years' War?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following represents a question within higher education?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!