1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arte-miy333 [17]
3 years ago
13

How were the Crusades different from some of the

History
1 answer:
MaRussiya [10]3 years ago
4 0
Different technology (duh), different nations fighting, and the biggest is probably the fact that the crusades were fought by Christians because the holy land had been taken by the Islamic people. So, the crusades were based off of religion and the Christain’s trying to reclaim their land from the Islam’s.
You might be interested in
What did the Interstate Commerce Act and the Sherman Anti-Trust Act have in common?
joja [24]

Answer:The correct  answer is A

Explanation: a) Both focused on the rail road industry.  The purpose of  Interstate Commerce Act and the Sherman Anti-trust Act is to set guidelines on how the railroad companies could do business. They have the same purpose. The Act became a Law which demanded "just and reasonable" rates; prohibited favoritism in  rates for shippers or products, prohibited special rates for individual shippers, prohibited pooling of traffic and established an Interstate  Commerce commission.

PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST

8 0
3 years ago
The alleged deal that settled the election is referred to as the compromise of 1877 because
irakobra [83]

Answer:

many believe Hayes was elected in exchange for a promise to end to Reconstruction

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Taken as a whole, the Articles of Confederation did not establish a strong national government, despite rules, such as those in
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

The government was able to request money from the people for things the government needed but they could not enforce these requests so the government overall had little money and no effective way to get it

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Were the colonists justified in resorting to violence to achieve their goals?
marusya05 [52]

Answer: Yes the colonist were justified in the violence towards the British because of all of the hardships and violence the British committed against the colonist. From the Stamp Act to the Townshend Act, to the Boston massacre were all things that led up to the colonist being fed up with the tyrant British king so they revolted to break away from Britian's grip.

Explanation: Hope this helps ;)

5 0
2 years ago
Help history history
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

slow economic growth and relatively high unemployment

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is most,some, an opinion?
    8·1 answer
  • All of the following are characteristics of democracy EXCEPT: a. electoral college free elections b. majority rule d. individual
    5·1 answer
  • The central idea of the polis was based on what?<br><br> What's the central idea of the polis
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is considered the mother civilization of Mesoamerica? A. Olmec B. Aztec C. Inca D. Maya
    9·2 answers
  • The caste system is a strict segregation of people according to social class in hindu society which is based on
    12·1 answer
  • Please please help me
    6·1 answer
  • After the Revolution in China the U.S. did something that upset Soviet leaders...what did they do?
    5·1 answer
  • What was revolutionary about Copernicus' heliocentric theory
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Zimmerman note draw America into World War I?
    7·1 answer
  • Pls pls pls help i will give brainleist pls help just copy the link pls help (=
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!