1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
riadik2000 [5.3K]
3 years ago
12

Explain why Texas, compared to other territories, was slow to become populated by both Spanish and Anglos.

History
2 answers:
Ludmilka [50]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Texas was slow to be populated because there were no empresarios to help colonize the land, and also because the land was extremely expensive.

Fudgin [204]3 years ago
7 0
Because it’s dry and in South America there is water around most of the time
You might be interested in
"The only representatives of the people of these colonies are persons chosen therein by themselves; and that no taxes ever have
butalik [34]

Answer:

We can conclude that the colonists should choose their representatives and only those representatives were allowed to collect taxes.

Explanation:

The text above shows how the tax collection decision was made in the colonies. It was decided that it was necessary for a colonial representative to be elected. This would have the responsibility of organizing and managing the colony, as well as promoting the taxes necessary for the colony to function and how the collection of these taxes would be. Only the representative could do this and it was necessary for the colonists to choose who would occupy this position.

8 0
3 years ago
Help meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee please brainliest for the first answer
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

d

Explanation:pls give brainliest

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
IM GIVING BRAINLIEST ITS NOT A!!
Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

c!!!

Explanation:

C!!!

6 0
3 years ago
BRANLIST!
andriy [413]

Answer:

A criticism of the judicial branch is that it has less of a check and balance than the other two branches in the sense that when it declares something as unconstitutional, the other two branches cannot veto or undo this decision. Basically, it has the power to make any law or decision unconstitutional without a check on that power. I disagree with this because the judicial branch has not declared anything unreasonably unconstitutional and they mostly use this power in ways that help the country as a whole

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
25 POINTS PLS HELP
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

I think so narrator feels like he/she didn't got the Justice that they deserved from Britishers and the god..

Explanation:

I hope you understood^^

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following reasons is the best possible explanation for the changes in Europe's population since 1750?  A- An increa
    12·1 answer
  • Did the winds that created dust storms blow away the topsoil?
    9·2 answers
  • Most rivers flow in a ______________ direction. Select one:
    6·2 answers
  • Multiple choice!! please help
    7·2 answers
  • In the late 1930s, the distinguished criminologist __________ first used the phrase “white-collar crime” to describe the crimina
    6·1 answer
  • In the late 1800s which group most often supported the group of the populist movement
    14·1 answer
  • 1. What is the procedure for appointing justices to the Supreme Court?
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think some European nations gave up their colonies without a fight, while others fought for their colonies? (just a f
    11·1 answer
  • 5.) How and why did former slaves remain economically
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the first amendment so important?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!