Answer:$9,000
Explanation:
The tax credit offered to adoptive parents to encourage adoption is reffered to as ADOPTION TAX CREDIT. The adoption tax credit is a nonrefundable tax credit. This means that people owing taxes are also fit or qualified to apply for the adoption tax credit.
In the United States of America, adoption tax credit qualified expenses include court costs, traveling expenses, lawyer's or Attorney's fee and other expenses for legal adoption of an eligible child.
It can be calculated by subtracting
the max's employer provided for the couple with adoption benefits of $4,000 from the incurred expenses of a total of $13,000 in qualified adoption expenses(from the question).
That is; $13,000-$4,000.
= $9,000.
Hence, the maximum amount of adoption credit they can take this year is $9,000.
The answer is: A) As deductibles decrease, policy costs tend to increase.
Deductibles refers to the amount of money that the insured had to pay before receiving benefit from the insurance company. If you sign a contract with lower deductibles, the amount of money usually would be allocated to the policy cost that you have to pay each months.
Answer:
The total loss in welfare to the economy will be -$32.
Explanation:
By intersecting the supply function QS to the demand function QD, we will find the equilibrium price:
QD = QS
16P - 8 = 64 - 16P
16P + 16P = 64 +8 =
32P = 72
P = $2.00
Replacing the equilibrium price either in QS or QD, we foind the equilibrium quantity:
QS = 64 - 16*2 = 64 -32
QS = 32
In this case the total revenues at the equilibrium price RE will be:
RE = 32 * $2 = $64
On the other hand if the government imposes a price floor at $3.00, then the new total revenues RN will be:
RN = 32 * $3 = $96
Therefore the total losses is find by subtracting the revenue at the goverment price floor RN to the revenue at the equilibrium price RE:
LT = RE - RN
LT = $64 - $96 = -$32
Answer: Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.
Explanation:
The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.
Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.
Answer:
d) the supremacy clause
Explanation:
Lyndon a man from Maryland, receives a federal license to perform a commercial fishing boat in a particular region off the Maryland shore. Maryland's state legislature passes a law that bans all commercial fishing in that region. The state law most likely breaks <u>the supremacy clause</u>. In the supremacy clause, it authenticates that the federal laws made will be agreeable to it. Also, the agreements should be made under its authorization
