The answer: True
if not it wouldn’t continue to more or it wouldn’t be steady
Answer:
Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do.
Explanation:
Lamarck and Darwin both were scientists who tried to understand the concepts of evolution. Lamarck's theory of evolution was based upon how living organisms vary during their lifetime, and after that they pass these changes to their offspring. While on the other hand Darwin's theory was very much based upon evidences and practical explanation that is why his theory became accepted and Lamarck's wasn't.
Bacitracin blocks the transport of nag and nam across the cytoplasmic membrane to the cell wall. Like other antimicrobials that block cell wall synthesis, this would result in weak cell walls and cell lysis. Antimicrobilas that act by inhibiting cell wall synthesis include beta-lactams, vancomycin and cycloserine and isoniazid and ethambutol among others. They prevent bacteria from increasing amount of peptidoglycan, they have no effect on existing peptodoglycan layer and therefore are effective only for growing cells.
Answer: B. Poorly adapted individuals never produce offspring
Explanation:
Natural selection is a theory that states organisms adapts to its environment due to differences in their phenotypes. So, <u>individuals with favorable traits are more likely to survive and reproduce</u>. It is a key mechanism of evolution, which is the change in traits of a population over generations.
<u>Populations respond to natural selection if they contain heritable variation </u>among them, wich means that individuals differ in the traits they transmit to their offspring.
Because of the environmental selection pressures, individuals produce more offspring than their environment can support. <u>The pressure determines which individuals will survive and reproduce</u>, while others will die because of predation or diseases. So, natural selection is based on the observations of adapted individuals.
