Answer:
The correct answer is GDP would definitely increase because GDP excludes leisure.
Explanation:
The GDP does not measure the level of development of a country, nor does it measure the quality or level of its educational system or its health. Come on, that the quality of life in general is not measurable by GDP, although it is true that countries with a higher GDP per capita can afford better health or education services, as well as better infrastructure and services in general.
It does not measure the state of the environment or the damage caused to it or natural resources by the economic activity carried out. In other words, GDP does not report externalities, that is, it does not reflect the total social benefits and costs derived from economic activity.
GDP does not measure the quality of the goods and services produced. The GDP figures are only numbers that do not take into account exactly what is being produced or what is the quality of what is produced. This prevents, for example, comparing production between different eras. Does a computer add up to GDP now than in the 80s? The answer is no. Does a country of services add up to an oil exporter? The answer is also no.
It ignores the value of elements that contribute to maintaining the level of well-being of the population, such as leisure or freedom. In freer countries or in which its inhabitants have more leisure time and better options in which to invest it, well-being is much greater.
Answer:
I have had too many fake friends to be okay with them
Explanation:
Answer:
Bounded Rationality
Explanation:
To begin with, it is essential to understand the concept of departmentalization.
Departmentalization centers on the idea that departments/divisions within an organization are grouped and/or sectioned, using some identified benchmarks. In extension, Departmentalizing, is simply the acts of engaging in departmentalization.
Bounded rationality, is a phenomenon that states that human reasoning and extension, logic could be threatened by a number of constraints. The constraints here could be human, material and physical resources. The implication is that an individual is not in possession of full details and information that could influence or shape his position.
Hence, by departmentalizing, an organization has placed a constraint on the amount of information accessible to that department, under the bigger context of an organization. Thus, the departments' rationality has been bounded and this could ultimately spiral into poor decision making, principally because of lack of detailed information.
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
Calculation of total manufacturing overhead:-
4000 units manufacturing overhead:
= Production volume × Manufacturing overhead
= 4,000 × $94
= $376,000
5000 units manufacturing overhead:
= Production volume × Manufacturing overhead
= 5,000 × $77.60
= $388,000
Variable cost per unit:


= 12
Fixed cost = Total cost - variable cost
= $388,000 - 5,000 × 12
= $388,000 - $60,000
= $328,000
So total monthly fixed manufacturing cost is $328,000.
Answer:
All of the above are true.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns was first formulated by the classic economist David Ricardo. It presupposes a technical relationship between input and output, which is not scientifically demonstrable but only empirically. In practice, in a generic production system, at any contribution of any factor, that is, land, labor, capital, machines, etc. there is no proportionally increasing production increase.
Normally it is assumed that the law does not always come into operation but only when the variable input exceeds a certain threshold. For example, the increase of workers on an assembly line certainly allows a proportional increase in production, but only until the entire system begins to suffer from malfunctions due to logistics or work organization, precisely because of the its getting bigger. Large industrial plants have shown that they must be divided into sections, however coordinated, precisely because of the decreasing returns. This is because the increase in the number of workers and the mass of the plants does not correspond to a consequent increase in production.