Answer:
a. One difference in the arguments expressed in the two sources regarding the effect of the revolution on the global political order is the main idea of them. In the first source, it states, " the American and French revolutionaries expanded the whole horizon of the age, opening a path of linear progress, grounding social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality, lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens." Meaning, the main idea the "whole horizon of the age" While in the second source it states, "The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countries and are thought to mark the emergence of citizenship, of national economies, of the very idea of the nation. But in their own time, the revolutions’ lessons were inconclusive. . . . The revolutions of the Americas began by drawing on ideas of [liberty and citizenship] . . . to redefine sovereignty and power within imperial polities but ended up producing new states that shared world space with reconfigured empires." Showing that the main idea was the coming(emergence) together of citizenship.
b. One development from the period of the Atlantic revolutions that grounded "social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality" is the institution a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens.
c. One way in which empires in the nineteenth-century successfully resisted revolutionary change is the Ottoman Empire. Ottoman isolation was finally and definitively broken, setting the stage for the more significant reforms that transformed the empire during the remainder of the 19th century.
Explanation:
Decreasing the money supply will cause the economy to contract. A fiscal policy is a vehicle that the government uses to adjust its income and expenditure levels. A government generates income by imposing taxes on its citizens. The levels of spending influence the nation's economy. Government spending affects most economic sectors in a country. <span>If there is lots of money to spend, the country's economy will expand, and vice versa. Prudent government spending is critical to a country's economy</span>
Post war Europe was reeling in from the destruction of not just their people but their lands and cities which took years to recover.
Explanation:
The war was fought extensively on the European soil and led to the degradation of the land to the point that it was difficult to get it back to what it used to be before the war.
It was not an issue for the Americans as the war never quite reached their own shores in the sense that none of it was on the mainland. This means that no common Americans died in the war directly.
It also meant that the infrastructure and social structure of US was largely intact which was not the case with Europe after the war.
The north of the US did not want slavery while the south did want slavery. they had a war over it (the civil war) the north won and slavery was abolished.
France is the right answer .
I hope that's help !
