<span>This change happened gradually. Quakers were some of the first people in the Americas to own slaves. However, objections were brought up by Dutch Quakers in the 18th century that changed the Christian sect's outlook on owning slaves.
From these objections, Quakers gradually stopped owning slaves and became some of the most vocal abolitionists. The Quaker biblical justification was in the verse Matthew 7:12 which stated that Christians had a responsibility to adhere to a higher standard of living morally. The Quakers did not believe owning slaves was a part of living up to these standards.</span>
I think its c yea its c i think
They are portrayed as savages, that lost their land to conquering Europeans and that what they tried to do they regret not achieving.
The evidence found in the Declaration of Independence: "That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,”
<span>The concept of natural rights and the notion of
the social contract were supreme in the thinking of the colonists when they dared
the right of Europe to control their economic and political lives. It's a
contract, meaning it can be cancelled by the people when they believe the
government is hindering their unalienable rights.
</span>
Answer:
If I help you will you mark as brainliest
Explanation:
Ok here you go
One significant principle of the Magna Carta involves the freedom of the church. In the Constitution, as listed in the 1st Amendment, freedom of religion is guaranteed. Taxes were another point mentioned in both documents. Another similarity between the documents is that both include the right of fair fines.
