Ambush. The Boers were rough civilians who knew the land, were good marksmen. The US military would call it "asymetrical warfare" (where the two sides are very dissimilar in terms of strengths, tactics and size). 2. Tremendous new capability of distance killing. New rifled guns meant that a good marksman could kill a man at much greater distances. 3. The first real focus on "hearts and minds" as the British recognized that the civilian population provided significant support for the "commandos" (a term that came out of this war" so <span>they formed "concentration camps" to herd all civilians into.</span>
There are many ways in which this was the case, but in general a theocracy was different from a government run by warrior-kings in that there was only one voice: that of God.
I think the answer is 1. But I’m not exactly sure
the answer to the question you seek is true not every countries marks nuclear waste as the same
During the 1960s, A leader named Mao Felt that the leadership in china was moving way to far in a direction with an force on expertise than on ideological purity, It was also known by the mass movement in China.It resulted in changing the cultural life more than any other event.It was a big failure as it made a greater disaster in china.
