Nope!! most historians have a bias, causing them to write history the way they saw it, often adding in their own opinions. for example, bartolome de las casas wrote about columbus, and was obviously against what he did.
To cause a source to be biased means that it is influenced by your opinion or another factor that is not factual. Bias can take away from the credibility because it is not completely true, as a source should be.
It would be "d. nationality" that had the biggest impact on the way the American colonists in different regions lived and worked, since people with similar nationalities tended to live together, and one major reason why many people left England and came to the American colonies would be "<span>d. widespread poverty and a growing population in England," since England was undergoing a "Malthusian Trap". </span>
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: " It committed the United States to a peacetime alliance to defend other nations." NATO represent a historic change in American foreign policy by committing the United States to a peacetime alliance to defend other nations.
Explanation:
Strong control of Germany isn't specifically true. They have their personal government. The Monroe Doctrine if recollection assists me is a sign for European nations to keep out of the New World .We had roots in other places, like the Philippines I suspect, and in Hawaii, etc. I can't think of any companies that commissioned us to protect other countries though.
