Answer:
B. The fact that two variables are strongly correlated does not in itself imply a cause-and-effect relationship between the variables.
Step-by-step explanation:
The term "correlation does not imply causation", simply means that because we can deduce a link between two factors or sets of data, it does not necessarily prove that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between the two variables. In some cases, there could indeed be a cause-and-effect relationship but it cannot be said for certain that this would always be the case.
While correlation shows the linear relationship between two things, causation implies that an event occurs because of another event. So the phrase is actually saying that because two factors are related, it does not mean that it is as a result of a causal factor. It could simply be a coincidence. This occurs because of our effort to seek an explanation for the occurrence of certain events.
Answer:
The answer to your question is: It could be letter A but power 5 is not necessary.
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplify like terms
1.- Remove parenthesis
(3m² + m - 5) + (3 - 6m² + 4m + 5m)
3m² + m - 5 + 3 - 6m² + 4m + 5m
2.- Group like terms
(3m² - 6m²) + (m + 4m + 5m) + (3 - 5)
3.- Simplify
- 3m² + 10m - 2
Answer:
For Part A:Change in Dan's increase is 1.6666666667 percent from his original pay and Kathy's is 1.53846153846 percent increase
For part B: The change in pay rates is greater for Dan than Kathy
H(x) would be (x - 3)(x + 10)
= x^2 + 7x - 30