Determine whether the stated conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, write invalid. Explain your reasoning.
3. Given: If a number is divisible by 4, then the number is divisible by 2. 12 is divisible by four.
Conclusion: 12 is divisible by 2.
SOLUTION:
If p → q is a true statement and p is true, then q. Here, a number divisible 4 is divisible by 2 also and 12 is divisible by 4. So, 12 is divisible by 2 is a valid statement by the Law of Detachment.
ANSWER:
valid; Law of Detachment
4. Given: If Elan stays up late, he will be tired the next day. Elan is tired.
Conclusion: Elan stayed up late.
SOLUTION:
If p is true, then q is true, but q being true does not necessarily mean that p is true. Elan could be tired because he worked out. So, the statement is invalid.
ANSWER:
Invalid; Elan could be tired because he worked out.
eSolutions Manual - Powered by Cognero
we are given the expression csc (2 pi / 3 ) and is asked to evaluate the expression. According to the trigonometric identities, the inverse of cosecant (CSC) is sine (sin) function. hence using the calculator in radians mode, sin 2pi/3 is equal to 2/sqrt 3. Taking the reciprocal of the answer, the final answer is 2 sqrt3 over 3.
Answer:
Write the inequality: 2.90h + 4.75
Solve the inequality: 2.90h + 4.75 = 39.55
Step-by-step explanation:
I’m not really sure if its correct I got it off somebody else’s brainly account
I’m actually currently doing the test right now and ive been using you’re page for the answers, thanks you’re account was a big help .
<em><u>ANSWER</u></em>
My answer is in the photo above
Answer:
you swallow too
Step-by-step explanation:
