Answer:
B. the national mail system from being used for criminal or illegal purposes.
Explanation:
The United States Postal Inspection Service is a federal law enforcement sector of the posting service that inspects and makes sure that the mail system is used in a fair and safe manner. This process safeguards the general public from any harm and also ensures the mail system from any illegal or dangerous activity.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is that the US Postal Inspection Service was created so that the national mail system will not be used for any criminal or illegal purposes and also to safeguard people from any harm.</u>
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.
Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;
-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and
-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.
The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.
On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or
-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults
#SPJ4
On a scale of one to ten, I would fully trust the the mainstream media to give us facts and full stories in an unbiased manner, because we have a wide access to information. While the accuracy of mainstream media is controversial, it is important to understand how to navigate through the information. Media can include false details, extreme opinions, and manipulative propaganda. However, it also includes great sources like government websites, scientific journals, and educational statistics. Doing background research on mainstream media sources, like news websites, can help determine if they are a trusted and reliable source. Finding factual, educational stories makes mainstream media a credible and important source of information.
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
Answer:
There are three types of juries in the United States: criminal grand juries, criminal petit juries, and civil juries
