1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dlinn [17]
3 years ago
13

A woman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. The crime scene was processed and inve

stigators left. The
next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. The police asked the husband to search the house
again to look for such a belt and he agreed. A belt was found that matched marks on the victim. The man was arrested. His attorney made a motion that the
belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. Which statement is true?

A)The belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. The police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the Fourth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

B) The belt is admissible as evidence, according to Mincey v. Arizona.

C)The belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. The police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to Michigan v. Tyler.

D)The belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search.
Law
2 answers:
LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

pickupchik [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the answer is d

Explanation:

because they asked the husband to go look again and he said yes

You might be interested in
Can someone tell me how to answer these questions!
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:

Explanation:

The truth of the legal would influence my decision. I would need more info to give you a complete answer in my opinion

3 0
3 years ago
Consider a local or national issue in which politicians/government must balance the interests of individuals with that of the pu
Damm [24]

Answer:

The government had already tried hard to judge the middle road of the public benefit against industries or companies, but it has also figured out a way of developing this practice.

An example of this will be legislation financing charter schools, that in general education may be seen as better schools. If that is so, charter schools are generally of the public interest, thus allowing the small group of people who operate these charter schools (sometimes for profit) corporations to operate these schools and the government. They often work in charter schools.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

Explanation:

John Locke, an English philosopher, widely referred to as Father of Liberalism, examines the "State of Nature" for the purpose of showing why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.

According to him, each individual in a society has a natural right to protect his or her own life, liberty, and property and at the same time, each individual has a natural right to seek for compensation for any wrongful injury to his or her natural rights; life, liberty, or property which has been inflicted by other individuals.

However, Locke, believed that, since 'state of nature' is more or less a state of insecurity, that is, each individual is not secured to possible infringement of his or her natural rights by other individuals. Hence, the needs to create a civil government, whose purpose is to protect the natural rights, freedom and well-being of all members of society.

This is because, in a "state of nature" there is no legislative or judicial authority that members of the society can seek for help in order to protect their natural rights, such as lives, liberty, or property. But to ensure there is security and protection to individuals natural right, there is need for a civil government, with a judicial authority whose purpose is to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.

7 0
3 years ago
What is normativity of law
dsp73

Answer:

Explanation:

When we say a law is normative, we mean two things. On the one hand, it means the particular law was made according to the procedure laid down for its making. This is technical validity or normativity of the law, falling within the pure theory of law by Hans Kelsen. On the other hand, a law is normative if it has some moral content in it.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
So I prank called this scam company here's there number and have fun
muminat
What is the company from?? What do they sell??
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who of the following would necessarily be included in the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ “unemployed” category? A. Huey, who did no
    7·1 answer
  • Is the number of democrats and republicans the same in Senate and House?
    15·1 answer
  • Why do you think the authors of the Fourth Amendment required law enforcement officers to establish probable cause before making
    11·1 answer
  • People who blame others or events beyond their control when something goes wrong are said to have a(n) A) authoritarian leadersh
    12·1 answer
  • Title VIII of the Education Act of 1972 prohibits gender discrimination in all elementary and secondary schools, colleges, and u
    9·1 answer
  • Giving away another brainliest!!
    10·2 answers
  • (10 points)
    12·2 answers
  • What is the relationship between the
    14·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE 50 POINTS! PLEASE HELP!!
    13·1 answer
  • In the federalist, no. 10, james madison argued in favor of a large republic because.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!