Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
The following must occur before an <u>underage individual</u> can participate in the research study:
- the parent/legal guardian must give permission for the minor to participate.
- the minor must agree to participate in the research.
<h3>What is a research study?</h3>
This refers to the systematic, rigorous and critical investigation that aims to answer questions.
Any research participant that is above 18 years is considered a non-minor and can participate in any kind of research study without seeking consent from guardians/parents.
Read more about research study
brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ1
Answer:
Not me but I wish I could
Pedestrians always have the right of way. Even if it appears you have the right of way, someone in a car is always responsible to look out for pedestrians